Archive for the ‘Fannie Mae’ Category
Posted by Larry Doyle on March 5th, 2010 12:38 PM |
“Let’s see, do you want to go for the prize behind Door #1 or take a chance on what’s in the big box?”
“Well Monty, I’m playing with your money so it doesn’t really matter now, does it?”
1970’s vintage TV may have been entertaining, but is the current deal-making used by Fannie Mae to liquidate housing inventory truly the way to develop a healthy and robust housing market?
Just what is Fannie Mae doing? (more…)
Tags: American Banker, Fannie Cuts FHA-Like Deals to Sell Homes, Fannie Mae, Fannie Mae Homepath, FICO scores, home appraisals, housing, Housing Crisis, housing finance, John Dutra, low down payments, mortgage finance, mortgage insurance
Posted in Fannie Mae, General | 2 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 26th, 2010 6:22 PM |
Is it any surprise that the next drawdown in a multi-billion dollar ongoing bailout gets posted at 5pm on a Friday afternoon? Not in this economy where Uncle Sam, that’s you and me boys and girls, continues to pay for the woefully mismanaged financial and legislative practices of those in Washington.
The gutless typically prefer to operate under a veil of darkness.
I am referring to the sinkhole that is the organization known as Fannie Mae, as it comes back to the well for another $15 billion. Bloomberg highlights this ongoing bleeding in writing, Fannie Seeks $15 Billion in U.S. Aid After 10th Straight Loss:
Fannie Mae, the mortgage-finance company under federal conservatorship, said it will seek $15.3 billion in aid from the U.S. Treasury after posting a 10th straight quarterly loss. (more…)
Tags: Barack Obama, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Daniel Mudd, Fannie Mae, Fannie Mae losses, Fannie Seeks $15 Billion in U.S. Aid After 10th Straight Loss, Franklin Raines, housing, Housing Crisis, housing policy, John Kerrey, Mortgage Crisis, Mortgages
Posted in Fannie Mae, General | 3 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on January 11th, 2010 9:28 AM |
Will America ever truly learn what happened on Wall Street that brought our markets, our economy, and our country to its knees?
We should not expect the incestuous Wall Street-Washington partners to implicate themselves and thoroughly expose their shortcomings. A full 16 months since the failure of Lehman Bros. and how much have we truly learned? What change has really occurred? Who has been fired in Washington? Who has been indicted on Wall Street? Will the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, charged with investigating the factors which facilitated our economic disaster, truly be effective?
The truth may hurt but if the hard questions are not asked, the failings are not exposed, and those responsible are not held to account, then the lessons will not be learned, and the experience will likely repeat itself.
Will the commission pretend to investigate, but ultimately wilt under the pressure of the incestuous pillars of power? Will the commission rise above the fray, hold people and institutions to account, and make our country proud? Will the commission use its power to subpoena, if need be?
Whom should the commission pursue? What agencies and institutions should the commission target? If I were on the commission, I would recommend pursuing the following targets: (more…)
Tags: Angelo Mozilo, armando falcon, Chris Cox, financial criis inquiry commission and mary schapiro, Financial crisis inquiry commission, financial crisis inquiry commission and finra, financial crisis inquiry commission and freddie and fannie, financial crisis inquiry commission and goldman sachs, financial crisis inquiry commission and originators, financial crisis inquiry commission and sec, financial crisis inquiry commission vs pecora commission, Franklin Raines, investigation of financial crisis inquiry commission, Leland Brendsel, Lloyd Blankfein, Mary Schapiro, mission of financial crisis inquiry commission, what will financial crisis inquiry commission investigate, who should financial crisis inquiry commission investigate ill, will financial crisis inquiry commission be effective, william donaldson
Posted in FINRA, Fannie Mae, Franklin Raines, Freddie Mac, General, Goldman Sachs, Mary Schapiro, SEC, derivatives, fraud | 17 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 31st, 2009 11:34 AM |
Blank checks are the antithesis of good public policy.
America can not allow the passage of time to lessen the outrage over the Obama administration’s Christmas Eve bonus to the financial sinkholes known as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Platitudes and posturing aside, the American taxpayer is being set up as never before.
A blank check may serve to cover a host of past financial and legislative failures promoted by the likes of Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, John Kerry et al, but who is monitoring and verifying the legitimate and proper use of these funds? Are we to blindly trust Treasury Secretary Geithner, White House economic adviser Larry Summers, and their respective staffs in this process? Are you kidding me? America needs to voice its outrage long and hard. In that spirit, I called yesterday to Audit Freddie and Fannie.
In the same vein, I am heartened by initiatives launched yesterday by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), and Reps. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) and Spencer Bachus (R-AL) to pursue an investigation of this blank check.
The Wall Street Journal reports, Lawmakers Want Probe Into Treasury Aid for Fannie, Freddie: >>> (more…)
Tags: audit Freddie and fannie, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Dennis Kucinich, Freddie and fannie's blank check, House Financial Services Committee, House Oversight and Government Reform panel, I want to roll the dice, John Kerry, Larry Summers, Scott Garrett, Spencer Bachus, sub-prime lending comment by Barney Frank, Tim Geithner, toxic assets on Wall Street, transferring losses from Wall Street to taxpayers, trust but verify
Posted in Barney Frank, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner | 9 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 30th, 2009 12:16 PM |
Who will reveal the truth and consequences embedded in the operations of Washington’s newly designed slush funds housed within Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae? The Washington Way all too often pays off those who promote the administration’s interests (both Republican and Democrat alike) while sticking future generations with an ever larger bill.
Is slush fund too harsh a characterization for a Washington-issued blank check? In my opinion, a blank check in Washington has never been anything other than that.
Ron Paul (R-TX) has created quite a stir in 2009 given his continual calls to audit the Fed. Who in Congress will call for the same treatment for Freddie and Fannie?
Let the record show that on December 30th, Sense on Cents is issuing what will be the first of many calls to audit Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Why am I calling for an audit of these entities? (more…)
Tags: audit Freddie and fannie, audit the fed, blank check for freddie and fannie, credit risk in mortgages, effective duration, Fannie Mae, Fannie Mae audit, freddie and fannie risks, Freddie Mac, Freddie mac audit, mortgage backed securities risks, mortgage risks, prepayment risk, risk in mortgages, risks within freddie and fannie, Ron Paul, what is duration
Posted in Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, General | 13 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 30th, 2009 7:56 AM |
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have served as Washington’s piggy bank for far too long. The issuance of a blank check by Uncle Sam on Christmas Eve to cover losses at Freddie and Fannie through 2012 only cements the legacy of the pigs who have fed at the Freddie and Fannie trough.
While the sty is mighty big, don’t think for a second that the pillaging and plundering of these organizations is restricted to the high and mighty politicos who pretend to know how to develop housing policy and programs. What do I mean?
Tucked away in one corner of the sty is this little gem posted by The Wall Street Journal, Freddie HR Chief’s Big Payday: (more…)
Tags: compensation at Freddie Mac, Freddie HR Chief's Big Payday, Freddie Mac pigsty, kenneth feinberg, Paul George of Freddie Mac, Tim Geithner, who is Paul George
Posted in Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, General | No Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 28th, 2009 8:38 AM |
I remain incensed at the sheer arrogance and brazen demeanor of the Obama administration providing a blank check on Christmas Eve to cover future losses of the failed institutions Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Given the fact that this check has been issued, America deserves to know what exactly it is covering. Over and above a full and total exposition of these government sponsored entities, America is in a position to demand certain retributions. Let’s bang the drum and demand some answers, including:
1. The current valuations of all of Freddie’s and Fannie’s holdings so America can fully evaluate those holdings relative to market prices.
2. The current fees being paid for all services rendered.
3. An independent audit.
4. Why aren’t these stocks delisted immediately? To allow stock in these entities to continue to trade is a total mockery of a legitimate market.
5. Clawback all bonus payments rendered to Franklin Raines, James Johnson, and Leland Brendsel, the executives at Fannie and Freddie who truly plundered these institutions. (more…)
Tags: delist fannie and freddie, fannie and freddie stock, Fannie and freddie's blank check, Fannie and freddie's contingency liabilities to Wall Street, Fannie and freddie's portfolio holdings, Fannie Mae, Fannie Mae and freddie Mac future, Franklin Raines, Freddie Mac, hat is fueling america's rage, James johnson, Leland Brendsel, socialized housing, w
Posted in Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, General | 8 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on September 2nd, 2009 8:57 AM |
With housing prices down 30+% on average over the last few years, is Uncle Sam blowing fresh air into the housing balloon and actually creating another housing bubble? I believe that’s exactly what is happening.
If you are scratching your head and think I am off base with my assertion, please navigate this path along our economic landscape with me.
What drove the housing bubble? Cheap rates and undisciplined lending from the private sector. What added to the bubble? The internal ‘hedge fund’ portfolios of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.
What is perpetuating the housing bubble if not creating another mini-bubble of sorts? Cheap rates and undisciplined lending directly from Uncle Sam or supported by Uncle Sam. What is adding to this bubble? Those same internal portfolios at Freddie and Fannie.
What entities within Uncle Sam’s domain are providing the cheap rates and undisciplined lending?
1. The Federal Housing Administration ( FHA-insured loans are packaged into GNMA securities, which have the explicit backing of Uncle Sam)
2. The Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing program in which it has purchased hundreds of billions in mortgage-backed securities with authority to purchase a total of $1 trillion+ in MBS is also blowing fresh air into the balloon.
3. Freddie and Fannie are also supporting the bubble by providing fresh capital via their portfolios.
People may say that Uncle Sam had to provide this capital because the private sector would not. In fact, The Wall Street Journal makes that very assertion this morning in writing, Industry Seeks Fannie, Freddie Overhaul:
Together with the Federal Housing Administration, Fannie and Freddie now purchase or guarantee nearly nine in 10 new mortgages, since private buyers of such loans have been absent amid the housing bust.
I categorically do not accept this assertion. There is more than enough private capital in the system to purchase these mortgages. The issue is that the private capital will only purchase these mortgages at appropriate risk adjusted prices. Freddie, Fannie, the FHA, and the Federal Reserve are stepping ‘through the market’ and subsidizing mortgage rates by at least 50 basis points and, in turn, crowding out private buyers. The WSJ continues:
Fannie and Freddie have taken nearly $96 billion of capital infusions from the U.S. Treasury since last November. The companies have received nearly 10 times that amount in additional support through purchases of debt and mortgage-backed securities by the Treasury and the Federal Reserve.
![[Picking up the Slack chart]](http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/NA-BA159A_FANFR_NS_20090901200812.gif)
Who is benefiting from these subsidized rates? New homeowners. Do not think for a second, however, that risks are properly aligned in this current mortgage dynamic.
The continued mispricing of risk will mean our housing market will experience more protracted levels of delinquencies, defaults, and foreclosures than if mortgage rates were higher and real discipline were instituted into the lending process.
In fact, unless our country accepts a fully socialized mortgage finance system, mortgage rates will have to move higher to reflect private sector pricing. Risks and returns will then be properly aligned and the bubble will deflate.
LD
Related Sense on Cents Commentary:
“Uncle Sam Guaranteeing Sub-Prime Loans” (May 4, 2009)
Tags: cheap mortgage money leads to housing bubble, continuation of housing bubble, Fannie Freddie Federal Housing Administration support of mortgages and housing, Federal Reserve buying of mortgages pepetuating housing bubble, FHA insured mortgages, FHA insured mortgages are former sub-prime mortgages, hedge funds at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, housing, housing bubble, Industry Seeks Fannie Freddie Overhaul, mortgage defaults and delinquencies, Uncle Sam is guaranteeing sub-prime mortgages, Uncle Sam's support of housing perpetuates bubble, undisciplined lending leads to housing bubble
Posted in Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, General, Housing Crisis, Mortgage Crisis, Mortgages | 2 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on August 6th, 2009 8:51 AM |
When losses get so large something ultimately must be done.
In that vein, I am not surprised to see news developing about Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae’s future. The Washington Post is reporting Administration Considers Splitting Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac:
The Obama administration launched a broad government effort this week to overhaul mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and is considering splitting the companies and putting their troubled assets in a new federally backed corporation, administration officials said.
Troubled assets is a misnomer. ALL of their assets are troubled. Some are more troubled than others. How so? Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae absorb all of the credit risk on loans which they guarantee. Given the current state of our domestic housing market, the risk or troubled nature of every mortgage in our country, let alone in Freddie and Fannie’s portfolio, has increased. As loans continue to default at ever increasing rates Freddie and Fannie just bleed money. More troubled assets encompass a variety of commercial mortgages, Alt-A, and sub-prime mortgages.
I am very interested to see how a good bank/bad bank model would be structured. The fact is to wipe the slate clean, Uncle Sam would literally have to move ALL of Freddie’s and Fannie’s current assets. At that point, Freddie and Fannie should simply guarantee future mortgages without actually purchasing them (meaning let the mortgage securities be purchased by private entities in the marketplace) with proper risk based pricing applied. Short of that, a restructured Freddie and Fannie will likely only replicate a version of past errors.
Do our regulators have the courage to push for this initiative? We will hear that they will work toward this structure ‘down the road.’ How long is the road? This situation will be very interesting. Will it be transparent?
Such an approach would keep the government on the hook for losses into the indeterminate future but would also clear the way for the revamped companies to play a critical role of financing home loans throughout the country.
This statement is nothing short of an acceptance of a ’socialized housing program’ to absorb current and future losses but also to underwrite future loans at what will effectively be below market rates. The fact is losses will be perpetuated simply because Freddie and Fannie will continue to subsidize mortgages via lower mortgage rates. In the process, risk is being mispriced under the guise of supporting our housing market. Increased risk will ultimately mean increased losses. (more…)
Tags: Administration Considers Splitting Fannie and freddie, Freddie ands fannie are socialized housing vehicles, Freddie mac and Fannie Mae's future, Freddie's and fannie's assets, housing, how might Freddie and fannie be split, James Lockhart resigns as director of FHFA, No Second act for Freddie and Fannie, socialized housing finance, socialized housing program, Uncle Sam will absorb freddie's and fannie's losses for a long time, Washington Post report on freddie and fannie, who fed at the Freddie and fannie trough, will Freddie and fannie be split, will Freddie and fannie have a good bank bad bank model
Posted in Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, General | No Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on July 23rd, 2009 11:15 AM |
Uncle Sam may think he can keep losses of tens of billions of dollars somewhat secretive, but when those losses cross into the hundreds of billions the dirt is much harder to keep under the rug.
What is the nature and size of this dirt? The losses assocated with those dastardly large twins, Fannie and Freddie. I lifted the rug on this dirt on June 18th in writing, Uncle Sam’s Dirty Little Secret.
Fannie and Freddie hold 50% of the mortgages in our country. These entities are most likely sitting on hundreds of billions in embedded losses currently with limited prospects to generate real revenue. They have no viable business model at this point in time.
CNN reports today, Fannie and Freddie: The Most Expensive Bailout
When Congress was debating the bailout of Fannie and Freddie last July, the official estimate from the Congressional Budget Office was that a bailout would most likely cost taxpayers $25 billion, with only a 5% chance of the price tag reaching $100 billion between them.
In addition, both Fannie and Freddie are likely to need billions of dollars more after they report second quarter results in the coming weeks. Experts believe the cost will only continue to rise in the next year.
“We’re assuming they each will cross the $100 billion mark fairly soon. They could be hitting the $200 billion barrier by the end of next year,” said Bose George, mortgage analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, an investment bank specializing in financial services firms.
The fact remains that these two wards of the state are no longer for profit entities but rather vehicles for promoting Obama’s housing plans and redistribution of wealth.
The losses within Fannie and Freddie will accrue as long as housing delinquencies and defaults increase. No credible analyst can truly predict when those statistics may peak. They can guess but given the runup in home prices along with the growth in housing, that is all they can do.
In fact, the argument can be made that the very policies being utilized to forestall delinquencies and defaults will ultimately exacerbate and extend the pressure on the housing market, and in turn, Fannie’s and Freddie’s losses.
Will the American taxpayer ever see a return on the funds being pumped into Fannie and Freddie? Don’t hold your breath.
CNN continues,
Neither firm has given an estimate as to how high losses will reach. But the original limit of $100 billion in losses set in place when the government put Fannie and Freddie into conservatorship, essentially a form of bankruptcy, last September was quickly raised early this year to $200 billion each because of concerns about looming losses.
In return for pumping taxpayer dollars into the two firms, Treasury received preferred stock, which is designed to give the government a healthy 10% to 12% dividend. But few expect that Fannie or Freddie will be able to pay that dividend, let alone return the money handed to the firms to cover their losses..
Even James Lockhart, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the government body that has overseen the two firms since they were placed into conservatorship, said it will be a challenge for Fannie and Freddie to make their scheduled payments.
Let’s be honest, Fannie and Freddie have become financial intermediaries used to promote a form of socialized housing.
With Uncle Sam’s dirty little secret now revealed, break out the industrial strength vacuums!
LD
Related Commentary
Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae Deja Vu? ; May 28, 2009
If you think Fannie and Freddie are alone amidst this dirt, they have sizable company in the form of the Federal Home Loan Bank system.
Tags: bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Bose George analyst at KBW comments on Fannie and Freddie, CNN report Fannie and Freddie: The Most Expensive Bailout, director of Federal Housing Finance Agency, Fannie and freddie are no longer for profit companies, Fannie Mae Freddie Mac and FHLBs losses, future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, housing, how large are losses at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, how much more money will fannie and Freddie need?, how will Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac be managed in the future, JAmes Lockhart, James Lockhart comments on Fannie and Freddie, losses within Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, socialized housing, what is going on at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, will taxpayer make money on Fannie and Freddie investments
Posted in Fannie Mae, Federal Home Loan Banks, Freddie Mac, General, Housing Crisis | 2 Comments »
Trust Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, Barney Frank?
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 31st, 2009 11:34 AM |
Blank checks are the antithesis of good public policy.
America can not allow the passage of time to lessen the outrage over the Obama administration’s Christmas Eve bonus to the financial sinkholes known as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Platitudes and posturing aside, the American taxpayer is being set up as never before.
A blank check may serve to cover a host of past financial and legislative failures promoted by the likes of Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, John Kerry et al, but who is monitoring and verifying the legitimate and proper use of these funds? Are we to blindly trust Treasury Secretary Geithner, White House economic adviser Larry Summers, and their respective staffs in this process? Are you kidding me? America needs to voice its outrage long and hard. In that spirit, I called yesterday to Audit Freddie and Fannie.
In the same vein, I am heartened by initiatives launched yesterday by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), and Reps. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) and Spencer Bachus (R-AL) to pursue an investigation of this blank check.
The Wall Street Journal reports, Lawmakers Want Probe Into Treasury Aid for Fannie, Freddie: >>> (more…)
Tags: audit Freddie and fannie, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Dennis Kucinich, Freddie and fannie's blank check, House Financial Services Committee, House Oversight and Government Reform panel, I want to roll the dice, John Kerry, Larry Summers, Scott Garrett, Spencer Bachus, sub-prime lending comment by Barney Frank, Tim Geithner, toxic assets on Wall Street, transferring losses from Wall Street to taxpayers, trust but verify
Posted in Barney Frank, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner | 9 Comments »