Posts Tagged ‘Tim Geithner’
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 22nd, 2010 6:05 AM |
Without the truth, we are mere slaves to a corrupt system and will never control or master our destiny.
I don’t write this premise whimsically nor do I accept it as a given. The fact is, our forefathers are rolling over in their graves right now given the fatuous culture our society has not only tolerated but promoted. I continually call for the pursuit of truth, transparency and integrity while navigating the economic landscape for the very reason that without these virtues we are doomed as a nation.
High five to AL for pointing out that none other than Thomas L. Friedman of The New York Times drills this very point in writing, The Fat Lady Has Sung. Whether you agree with Friedman’s politics is immaterial. (more…)
Tags: Ben Bernanke, foundation of American culture and society, integrity, need for integrity, need for transparency, need for truth, rationalizing the truth, The Fat Lady Has Sung, The New York Times Thomas L. Friedman, Thomas L. Friedman, Thomas l. friedman The Fat Lady Has Sung, Tim Geithner, transparency, truth, Wall Street, Washington
Posted in General | 2 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 11th, 2010 9:34 AM |
The initial Bank Stress Tests run by Treasury Secretary Geithner were largely a sham. I questioned as much last April in writing, “Bank Stress Tests: Major Sham?”:
As with any test, the results are only meaningful if the process and proctor have unquestioned integrity. The proctors for the Bank Stress Test are none other than Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Fed chair Ben Bernanke. Why is a testing authority of the magnitude of FDIC, led by Sheila Bair, not more involved in the process? Ms. Bair is the one individual in our country with the greatest level of interaction with and understanding of the student body, that being the banking industry as a whole and individual banks specifically.
What does the FDIC, led by Ms. Bair, have to say about the upcoming Bank Stress Tests? The New York Post provides a CHILLING perspective: (more…)
Tags: Bank Stress Tests, banks, Barack Obama, Ben Bernanke, commercial real estate, community banks, CRE, Elizabeth Warren, FDIC, lack of bank transparency, losses on commercial real estate, Sheila Bair, stress tests, Tim Geithner
Posted in Bank Stress Test, General | 6 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on January 7th, 2010 9:31 AM |
Tim Geithner, then head of the New York Fed, blinked and screwed the American taxpayer out of billions of dollars in the process. How so?
Geithner and his cronies in Washington have misrepresented–if not outright lied–about the payments to both domestic and foreign banks in settling exposures to then failing AIG. While politicians and pundits alike will reference the precarious nature of the time and heat of the moment to defend Geithner and his cronies, the simple fact is the settlement of the AIG swaps at 100 cents on the dollar was nothing short of one of the greatest heists in our country’s history.
This heist transferred multiple billions of dollars from the American taxpayer to the likes of Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Societe Generale, and many more domestic and foreign banks as well. (more…)
Tags: AIG, AIG payment to Societe Generale, AIG swaps, AIG swaps settlement 100 cents on dollar, Darrell Issa, Darrell Issa Tim Geithner AIG, Geithner's new york fed Told AIG to Limit swaps disclosures January 7 2009, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Lloyd Blankfein Goldman Sachs, payments to banks, settlement of AIG swaps, Societe Generale, Tim Geithner, Wall street owns Washington
Posted in AIG, General, Tim Geithner | 21 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 31st, 2009 11:34 AM |
Blank checks are the antithesis of good public policy.
America can not allow the passage of time to lessen the outrage over the Obama administration’s Christmas Eve bonus to the financial sinkholes known as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Platitudes and posturing aside, the American taxpayer is being set up as never before.
A blank check may serve to cover a host of past financial and legislative failures promoted by the likes of Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, John Kerry et al, but who is monitoring and verifying the legitimate and proper use of these funds? Are we to blindly trust Treasury Secretary Geithner, White House economic adviser Larry Summers, and their respective staffs in this process? Are you kidding me? America needs to voice its outrage long and hard. In that spirit, I called yesterday to Audit Freddie and Fannie.
In the same vein, I am heartened by initiatives launched yesterday by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), and Reps. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) and Spencer Bachus (R-AL) to pursue an investigation of this blank check.
The Wall Street Journal reports, Lawmakers Want Probe Into Treasury Aid for Fannie, Freddie: >>> (more…)
Tags: audit Freddie and fannie, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Dennis Kucinich, Freddie and fannie's blank check, House Financial Services Committee, House Oversight and Government Reform panel, I want to roll the dice, John Kerry, Larry Summers, Scott Garrett, Spencer Bachus, sub-prime lending comment by Barney Frank, Tim Geithner, toxic assets on Wall Street, transferring losses from Wall Street to taxpayers, trust but verify
Posted in Barney Frank, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner | 9 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 30th, 2009 7:56 AM |
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have served as Washington’s piggy bank for far too long. The issuance of a blank check by Uncle Sam on Christmas Eve to cover losses at Freddie and Fannie through 2012 only cements the legacy of the pigs who have fed at the Freddie and Fannie trough.
While the sty is mighty big, don’t think for a second that the pillaging and plundering of these organizations is restricted to the high and mighty politicos who pretend to know how to develop housing policy and programs. What do I mean?
Tucked away in one corner of the sty is this little gem posted by The Wall Street Journal, Freddie HR Chief’s Big Payday: (more…)
Tags: compensation at Freddie Mac, Freddie HR Chief's Big Payday, Freddie Mac pigsty, kenneth feinberg, Paul George of Freddie Mac, Tim Geithner, who is Paul George
Posted in Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, General | No Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on November 25th, 2009 8:51 AM |
Is Treasury Secretary Geithner on the hot seat? With populist anger rising in the land, will Geithner be Obama’s sacrificial lamb to appease the masses? Why is Geithner in the line of fire?
1. the economy.
2. perception that he is the chair of the “Wall Street-Washington Incest Club.”
3. the disregard for our currency.
4. does not command full respect in the international community.
Geithner is getting hit with volleys from both sides of the aisle. Is the tepid support provided by the White House an indication that Tim is being readied to be fed to the wolves or simply an unwillingness to acknowledge the topic?
The fact is, the economy is not going to improve anytime soon. Obama’s approval ratings have declined along with the economy. Obama has already indicated his support for Ben Bernanke’s return as Fed chair. While the administration would prefer the topic of Geithner’s fate to go away, it is picking up momentum. Bloomberg discussed Geithner’s potential dismissal this morning.
Who would be Geithner’s likely replacement? JP Morgan’s CEO Jamie Dimon. (more…)
Tags: geither lacks gravitas, Jamie Dimon, obama approval ratings decline may lead to him firing tim geithner, populist rage may cause geithner's firing, Secretary Dimon, Tim Geithner, weak dollar may lead to geithner's firing, weak economy may caue geithner to be fired, why would geithner be fired, Will geithner be fired
Posted in General, Jamie Dimon, Tim Geithner | 7 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on October 29th, 2009 9:52 AM |

FDIC Head Sheila Bair
“Too big to fail.”
Do you think the American public is sufficiently sickened by that phrase? No doubt.
How will our ‘wizards in Washington’ handle this monstrous issue going forward? Is there any doubt that the industry itself should be held accountable to provide the necessary capital to unwind firms deemed ‘too big to fail?’ Of course not. However, the execution of that policy is where the rubber meets the road and where we learn who in Washington is truly working for the American public and who is working for the financial industry. How so? Let’s navigate. (more…)
Tags: Bair Breaks With Obama Urges Preepaying Costs to Unwind Firms, FCRF, FDIC, Financial Company Resolution Fund, Sheila Bair, systemic regulator, systemic risk, Tim Geithner, too big to fail, unwinding firms too big to fail
Posted in Bank Failure, Banking Institutions, General, regulation, Sheila Bair, Tim Geithner | 4 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on October 5th, 2009 12:40 PM |
“You can’t handle the truth!!”
While the above line by Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men may have made for good theatre, it makes for lousy public policy. Regrettably, Uncle Sam has utilized that approach in its initial disbursement of funds via the TARP (Troubled Asset Recovery Program). That opinion is not strictly mine (although I do agree with it), but rather that of Neil Barofsky, the inspector general charged with overseeing the bank bailouts.
The New York Times sheds light on Barofsky’s feelings this morning in writing, Inspector’s Report on Bailouts Says Treasury Misled Public:
The inspector general who oversees the government’s bailout of the banking system is criticizing the Treasury Department for some misleading public statements last fall and raising the possibility that it had unfairly disbursed money to the biggest banks.
A Treasury official made incorrect statements about the health of the nation’s biggest banks even as the government was doling out billions of dollars in aid, according to a report on the Troubled Asset Relief Program to be released on Monday by the special inspector general, Neil M. Barofsky.
There is NO doubt that Uncle Sam, in the persons of Hank Paulson, Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner, Larry Summers et al, has little confidence that the American public can handle the truth about the overall health of our banking industry.
That said, the lack of transparency and integrity as highlighted by Mr. Barofsky does not come without a cost. What is that cost? Lessened confidence in our regulators and our markets going forward.
I addressed these very topics of financial regulatory transparency and integrity on my radio show last evening. In the process of interviewing former SEC attorney Genevievette Walker-Lightfoot, I made the following comment in regard to the statement put forth a month ago by SEC Inspector General David Kotz dealing with the SEC’s failures on the Madoff investigation. I said:
If that is the kind of face saving self-serving approach, people are going to call foul on it. The real cost is, and I think we are bearing this cost right now whether with the SEC or with FINRA, if you’re not going to be honest with us how can we fully trust that you’ll be honest on a going forward basis?
Now I’ll grant you I guess we don’t have much choice. What are we going to scrap the entire SEC or scrap the entire FINRA and start from scratch? Some people may say that’s what we want to do, but that’s obviously not going to happen.
It does get to the point where there’s got to be total transparency. There’s got to be total integrity. There’s got to be total accountability and if people haven’t done the job or are incapable of doing the job then you know what, for the long haul – and I’m not talking about the next six months but rather the next ten, fifteen, twenty years – people got to go and other people got to come!!
Genevievette Walker-Lightfoot responded:
“I agree. That’s true.”
How about you, what do you think? Can you handle the truth? Wouldn’t you like to be given the opportunity?
LD
Note: the views expressed by Genevievette Walker-Lightfoot during last night’s show are her own personal views and do not in any way reflect her position as an employee of the Federal Reserve Board.
Tags: bailouts, banks, David Kotz, FINRA, Hank Paulson, integrity, Madoff, Neil Barofsky, New york times Inspector's Report on Bailouts Says Treasury Misled Public, regulation, regulators, SEC, SIGTARP, TARP, Tim Geithner, transparency, truth, Walker-Lightfoot, Wall Street, Washington
Posted in General, Henry Paulson, TARP, Tim Geithner | 1 Comment »
Posted by Larry Doyle on September 23rd, 2009 12:37 PM |
Are Big Ben Bernanke and Turbo-Tim Geithner preparing to gently turn the lights up, turn the music down, put away the hard booze, and throw the coffee on? Have the partygoers on Wall Street had too much of a good time? Has the ‘liquid-ity’ flowed a little too liberally at this bash?
We will all learn more today at 2:15pm or thereabouts when the Fed releases its regular statement assessing our economy. Will a slightly more positve view of the economy actually be met with a selloff in the markets? I believe that may very well happen. Why? The Wall Street party’s ‘hosts,’ that being Bernanke and Geithner, need to prepare the partygoers to sober up, which is a very delicate undertaking. As with any sobering process, the first thing you do is make sure you have called your friends down at ‘the station’ so nobody gets picked up unnecessarily. That ‘cover’ has worked wonders for a long time, but the partygoers may want one more ‘get out of jail free’ card at this juncture. We saw as much in the token fine assessed by the SEC ‘cops’ against Bank of America just last week.
Bloomberg highlights the predicament of the party’s host in writing, Fed May Signal U.S. Economic Recovery Has Started. We do not need to be mentalists to read the tea leaves indicating the Fed’s juice is likely to slow and that it may be time to go home. Bloomberg writes:
>>”The bottom is no longer falling out, but the recovery is still at a very early stage,” said Gertler, who worked with research on the Great Depression with Bernanke before he became Fed chairman. “There is no need to expand the balance sheet now, but it is a bit too early to begin shrinking it.”
>>Central bank officials may also discuss changing the size and duration of their plan to buy as much as $1.25 trillion of mortgage-backed securities and $200 billion of agency debt by the end of this year, said former Fed governor Laurence Meyer, now vice chairman of St. Louis-based Macroeconomic Advisers LLC.
>>Three district bank presidents — Jeffrey Lacker of Richmond, James Bullard of St. Louis and Dennis Lockhart of Atlanta — raised the possibility that the Fed may not spend all the money authorized for the mortgage-backed debt.
>>Fed officials have started talks with bond dealers to use so-called reverse repurchase agreements to drain some of the cash the central bank has pumped into the economy, according to people with knowledge of the discussions.
How are the partygoers on Wall Street preparing for the slowing, if not the end, of this block party? The Treasury yield curve is flattening today. I highlighted this likelihood yesterday when I wrote, “Is the Federal Reserve Readying a Stealth Tightening of Monetary Policy?”
You do not have to listen very hard, though, to hear the crowd on Wall Street sharing their feelings. In fact, this classic tune by Southside Johnny and the Asbury Jukes is playing on Wall Street right about now. ~ LD
Related Sense on Cents Commentary:
“Bernanke Promises to Keep ‘Punch Bowl’ Filled” (July 21, 2009)
Tags: Ben Bernanke, does fed see economy improving, Fed discussions to utilize reverse repos, Fed May Signal U.S. Economic Recovery Has Started, Fed statement on September 23 2009, Federal Reserve policy, Federal Reserve programs to monitor monetary policy, how will Fed react to imrpoving economy, how will Wall Street sober up?, Jeffrey lacker of Richmond Fed James Bullard of St. Louis Fed Dennis Lockhart of Atlanta Fed, Laurence Meyer comments on Fed's buying of mortgages, Tim Geithner, Wall Street cops protect the partygoers, will Fed change its quantitative easiing program in purchasing mortgages, will the Fed change policy to drain liquidity, will Wall Street be forced to sober up
Posted in Federal Reserve, General | No Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on May 4th, 2009 8:08 AM |
As Obama looks to send a message to the American public that he will clean up Wall Street, hedge funds are “under the microscope.” Who in Washington will be delegated to lead the charge? None other than SEC head, Mary Schapiro. Bloomberg reports, SEC Chief Schapiro Wants Authority to Make Hedge-Fund Rules.
Hedge funds have become dirty words. When Washington wants to convey excessive Wall Street greed, politicians and regulators now regularly slip “hedge funds” into their statement.
As with any industry, hedge funds run the gamut in terms of business practices and ethics. It is well documented, though, that Washington solicits and receives excessive campaign contributions from the hedge fund community.
I agree that the hedge fund industry deserves greater scrutiny. A trillion dollar industry unregulated is a breeding ground for problems.
Bloomberg reports:
“It’s probably not enough just to register hedge funds” with the SEC, Schapiro said in an interview on Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt,” airing this weekend. “It may well be necessary to put in place particular kinds of rules.”
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s plan to overhaul financial oversight in response to the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression would force hedge funds to register with the SEC, subjecting firms to new disclosure requirements and inspections by agency staff. Schapiro said the SEC’s authority should be broader, so it can impose further restrictions on funds as “situations evolve.”
President Barack Obama yesterday blamed hedge funds that had lent Chrysler LLC money for triggering the automaker’s bankruptcy. Obama said the funds were “speculators” that refused the administration’s buyout offers because they were holding out for an “unjustified taxpayer bailout.”
Schapiro said “it’s certainly possible” that the SEC would consider forcing hedge funds to publicly disclose short- sale positions, imposing restrictions on leverage and restricting what the firms can invest in.
Does anybody have an issue with increased disclosure and oversight? Transparency is critically important in making sure the playing field for all investors is kept fair and level.
Ms. Schapiro does have experience with hedge funds prior to this engagement, though. As I have highlighted, Ms. Schapiro, as head of FINRA, oversaw investments within FINRA’s internal portfolio which included hedge funds, fund of funds, and private equity.
From the 2007 FINRA Annual Report:
FINRA also has investments in hedge funds and funds of hedge funds that it accounts for under the equity method and includes in other investments in the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had hedge fund investments of $431.2 million.
Ms. Schapiro should be compelled to share with the investing public in which hedge funds FINRA invested.
Will those funds withstand the rigor of newly proposed SEC regulation? At the very least we may learn whether Ms. Schapiro was a good steward of FINRA funds. Beyond that, we may learn a lot more.
If the Obama administration is serious about developing new regulations for Wall Street, let’s make sure the transparency includes Ms. Schapiro’s tenure at FINRA and details of FINRA’s investment portfolio!!
LD
Tags: FINRA, FINRA and hedge funds, FINRA's 2007 Annual Report, FINRA's investment in fund of funds, FINRA's investment in hedge funds, FINRA's investment portfolio, hedge fund oversight, hedge fund regulation, Mary Schapiro, Mary Schapiro SEC head, Mary Schapiro's tenure at FINRA, oversight of hedge funds, regulation of hedge funds, Tim Geithner
Posted in FINRA, General, Hedge Funds, SEC | 4 Comments »
Trust Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, Barney Frank?
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 31st, 2009 11:34 AM |
Blank checks are the antithesis of good public policy.
America can not allow the passage of time to lessen the outrage over the Obama administration’s Christmas Eve bonus to the financial sinkholes known as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Platitudes and posturing aside, the American taxpayer is being set up as never before.
A blank check may serve to cover a host of past financial and legislative failures promoted by the likes of Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, John Kerry et al, but who is monitoring and verifying the legitimate and proper use of these funds? Are we to blindly trust Treasury Secretary Geithner, White House economic adviser Larry Summers, and their respective staffs in this process? Are you kidding me? America needs to voice its outrage long and hard. In that spirit, I called yesterday to Audit Freddie and Fannie.
In the same vein, I am heartened by initiatives launched yesterday by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), and Reps. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) and Spencer Bachus (R-AL) to pursue an investigation of this blank check.
The Wall Street Journal reports, Lawmakers Want Probe Into Treasury Aid for Fannie, Freddie: >>> (more…)
Tags: audit Freddie and fannie, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Dennis Kucinich, Freddie and fannie's blank check, House Financial Services Committee, House Oversight and Government Reform panel, I want to roll the dice, John Kerry, Larry Summers, Scott Garrett, Spencer Bachus, sub-prime lending comment by Barney Frank, Tim Geithner, toxic assets on Wall Street, transferring losses from Wall Street to taxpayers, trust but verify
Posted in Barney Frank, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner | 9 Comments »