RSS Feed
Twitter
Facebook
Email
HomeWhat’s the Market Telling Us?
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 11th, 2009 9:38 AM |
In the face of generally positive economic news the last two days, (Retail Sales this morning rose 1.3% and the improving Trade Deficit), the price action in the market is very interesting. What is it telling us? Let’s navigate.
With the U.S. Dollar Index having firmed over the last week, money does not appear to be coming out of the equity markets. The major equity averages are up anywhere from .5 to 2.5% on the month. What market segments are feeling the bulk of the pain? Government bonds and commodities, primarily oil and gold.
Interest rates on U.S. government bonds have continued to move higher as Treasury supply this week has not been well received. With rates on 10yr U.S. Treasurys higher by .35% over the last ten days, it would appear that market participants continue to believe the Fed will be forced to raise rates or make other moves to lessen the support and stimulus provided to the economy.
If rates are to move higher, our dollar should find support . . . and it is, as the U.S. Dollar Index remains above the 76.00 level. While dollar strength had been a harbinger of general weakness across almost all risk-based asset classes, the commodity sector is bearing the brunt of the pain currently.
The DJ-UBS Commodity Index has declined by 2.5% on the month led lower primarily by oil (down approximately 10% on the month) and gold (down 4% on the month).
Add it all up and what does it mean? If our domestic economy is in fact stabilizing, then the public at large and investors will compel the Grand Old Man, that is Uncle Sam, to back away from continuing to provide stimulus. As that occurs, the market may begin to normalize to levels at which private investors care to put money to work. At this juncture, investors are saying interest rates are not attractive at current levels. As interest rates rise, that may actually temper an economic rebound, especially in housing.
So be it. It is not realistic for market participants “to have their cake and eat it too.”
LD
All Eyes on the U.S. Dollar Index
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 7th, 2009 9:22 AM |
What’s leading the market both up and down?
Regular readers here at Sense on Cents are fully aware of my focus on the U.S. dollar as the primary driver of our markets over the course of the last half year. This past summer, the BRIC nations regularly railed on our greenback as the international reserve currency. Japan jumped on that bandwagon, as well.
The pressure on the greenback supported by the Fed’s easy money policy served as the fuel that launched our markets from the intermediate pullback experienced in early July.
Check out the patterns in the U.S. Dollar Index versus the movement in the S&P 500 since early July. These indexes are almost mirror images of each other. While the order of magnitude is not exact, the direction is very highly correlated.
I certainly believe this correlation will continue and rest assured active traders on Wall Street are watching this relationship closely as well. In fact, what happened overnight? Equity markets traded off as the U.S. Dollar Index continued to firm. (more…)
October 10, 2009: Month to Date Market Review
Posted by Larry Doyle on October 10th, 2009 10:12 AM |
We are reaching a point in our new “Uncle Sam” economy where rhetoric from Wall Street, Washington, and global financial centers seems to be having greater impact than true market and economic fundamentals. Why? Our financial and political ‘wizards’ are working overtime to reconnect the great ‘disconnect’ between Wall Street and Main Street. While we receive glimmers of hope in certain economic statistics, the dark clouds in employment and housing remain daunting.
Are the ‘Washington wizards’ (Bernanke, Geithner, Summers) providing hints of support for our greenback while truly hoping for a manageable decline? I believe they are, and I believe this financial engineering is a very dangerous game.
I thank you for reading my work, and now let’s collectively ‘navigate the economic landscape,’ the mission of Sense on Cents.
ECONOMIC DATA
> Non-manufacturing Institute of Supply Management: this report rose above 50 (an indication of growth) with a positive development in new orders (this is clearly good), but with no signs of improvement in employment and pricing power by manufacturers.
> Redbook: indications of slight improvement in same store sales although next week’s Retail Sales report will likely look exceptionally weak as it incorporates an end to the ‘Cash for Clunkers’ program. Overall signs point to what is expected to be a weak holiday retail season.
> Jobless Claims: overall claims declined, which presents a sign of stability within employment. That said, it is hard to be optimistic on the employment front on the heels of the employment report released on October 2nd (embedded within the Equity section of this commentary).
> Trade Deficit: this deficit surprisingly narrowed, with a slight increase in exports combined with a slight decrease in imports. All other things being equal, this report would be positive for our dollar but the noise surrounding our currency is overwhelming the focus within this one month reading.
I would typically lead my review with focus on the equity and bond markets, but those sectors are actually following developments in the currency and commodity markets so let’s shift our focus accordingly.
How did the markets handle the Fed-speak, the data, and technical flows? Let’s continue navigating. The figures I provide are the weekly close and the month-to-date returns on a percentage basis.
U.S. DOLLAR
$/Yen: 89.78 vs. 89.68
Euro/Dollar: 1.4709 vs. 1.4635
U.S. Dollar Index: 76.35 vs. 76.72
Commentary: the overall U.S. Dollar Index has declined by approximately .5% this month, but the volatility and focus on movements in this space have been tremendous. Precipitated by an increase in rates by the Australian Central Bank midweek, the U.S. Dollar Index plunged below 76 which represents multi-year lows. The dollar weakness led to a move higher in global equities as traders, investors, and speculators were emboldened to enter into more ‘positive dollar carry trades.’
While I think Washington is not disappointed in a relatively weak dollar, although they should be (“Dollar Devaluation Is a Dangerous Game”), other countries are not overly keen about further dollar weakness. Why? A weak dollar puts those countries in a marginally less competitive position in international trade. ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet voiced his concerns on this topic. Rest assured, the Asian nations feel the same way although they are careful in their comments. Adding further fuel to dollar weakness was speculation that the trading of oil and a basket of other commodities, which are currently transacted in U.S. dollars, would shift trading away from being dollar-based. On that note, let’s review the action in commodities.
COMMODITIES
Oil: $72.29/barrel vs. $70.39
Gold: $1050.1/oz. vs. $1008.2 !!!! THE BIG WINNER !!!!
DJ-UBS Commodity Index: 129.177 vs. 127.683
Commentary: I view this segment of the market to be the STRONGEST indicator of the global economic pulse. Additionally, the price action in commodities is likely a strong indication of the ‘positive carry’ trade put on by hedge funds and other traders.
The overall commodity index has moved higher by approximately 1.2% on the month, but the movements within specific commodities is gaining the real focus. Gold specifically has soared by over 4% this month. Why? Market speculation about a potential further slide in the greenback would be inflationary. Oil and other commodities also benefited from the story I referenced above. The conundrum I find in this space revolves around overall levels of international trade. Are these commodities moving higher truly because of an increase in demand or merely because of speculative investing and trading? Where do we go to get a pulse on that? The Baltic Dry Index. How is our friendly indicator of global shipping activity doing?
The Baltic Dry Index continues to move marginally lower. Can global equities in general and commodities specifically increase in value if the major indicator of global trade, that being the BDI (Baltic Dry Index), is in a downtrend? I think not for the long haul, but for a period of time a cheap funding vehicle, that is the U.S. dollar, can override market fundamentals.
I read these commodity tea leaves as sign of inflationary expectations in these ‘inputs’ while we encounter deflationary pressures in wages and real estate. What a world.
EQUITIES
DJIA: 9865, +1.6%
Nasdaq: 2139, +0.8%
S&P 500: 1071, +1.3%
MSCI Emerging Mkt Index: 946, +3.6%
DJ Global ex U.S.: 197.6, +1.5%
Commentary: equities regained momentum after last week’s selloff. Recall how just one week ago, we faced a remarkably weak and disappointing Unemployment Report which culminated a week in which equities had given up approximately 2%. Well, we not only recaptured that decline but rallied further by another 1-2%. This past week accounted for the strongest advancement in equities since early July. Are we poised for a breakout past 10,000 on the Dow? Well, we need to remain focused on what is driving the market . . . and that is the weak greenback.
Indications of economic strength in Australia compelled the Australian Central Bank to raise rates which drove the Aussie higher and the dollar to new lows. In the process, the ‘dollar carry trade’ gained momentum propelling global equities higher.
The initial earnings reports released continue to show no real signs of improvement in top line revenue generated by increased sales while the bottom lines have improved given ongoing cost cutting progams. If a company cuts ALL its costs, will its stock still go higher? Rising stock values ultimately need to be driven by ‘growth.’
BONDS/INTEREST RATES
2yr Treasury: .97%, an increase of 2 basis points or .01%
10yr Treasury: 3.39%, an increase of 9 basis points
The yield curve steepened (longer maturities underperformed shorter maturities) under the weight of another Treasury refunding (3yr, 10yr, and 30yr). The 30yr auction on Thursday was disappointing which precipitated the selloff. The bond market has been trading in sync with equities for the last few months. That price action is an anomaly as typically bonds will trade in an inverse relationship with equities. Comments by Bernanke in the latter part of the week about an eventual and timely increase in rates by the Fed did take the wind out of the bond market’s sails.
COY (High Yield ETF): 6.64, +3.8%
FMY (Mortgage ETF): 17.85, +0.3%
ITE (Government ETF): 57.77, -0.3%
NXR (Municipal ETF): 14.46, +0.1%
Commentary: while interest rates did move marginally higher over the week, overall they remain at remarkably low levels. The high-yield market remains on fire as that sector is benefiting from a lot of hedge funds allocating capital via the ‘dollar carry trade’ referenced previously.
Summary/Conclusion
The game continues. The disconnect between the overall domestic economy and the price action in the markets presents what one noted investor described as ‘the greatest experiment’ in modern finance. To the extent that people are putting money to work, I would focus on buying quality and utilizing ‘dollar cost averaging’ techniques.
Thanks for your support. If you like what you see here, please subscribe via e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, or an RSS feed.
Thoughts, comments, questions always appreciated.
Have a great day and weekend.
LD
Dollar Devaluation Is a Dangerous Game
Posted by Larry Doyle on October 8th, 2009 9:24 AM |
Can we ‘devalue’ our way back to our days of economic ‘wine and roses?’
Many debt-laden countries throughout economic history have chosen to implicitly or explicitly pursue a devaluation of their currency as a means of improving their economies. Are the ‘wizards in Washington’ taking this approach? Aside from a few perfunctory comments in defense of the greenback, Washington has been largely silent on the topic of the declining value of the dollar. Many believe Washington very much favors a weaker currency as a means of supporting our economy. I believe this of Washington, as well. Let’s navigate.
Going back to the G20 in London last Spring, the Obama administration has attempted to curry political favor with emerging economies, especially the BRIC nations, by ceding dollar sovereigncy as the preeminent international reserve currency in return for support of global economic stimulus programs. Why does Washington believe a weak currency serves our economic interests? A weak currency generates and supports the following:
1. Promotes inflation as imports decline. Washington would like some inflation, given the massive deflationary pressures presented by falling wages and declines in the value of commercial and residential real estate.
2. Promotes exports for corporations with a multi-national presence.
3. Supports labor by making it more attractive for companies to keep jobs here as opposed to opening factories or sending work overseas.
So, in light of our current economic crisis, why wouldn’t we want a substantially cheaper dollar to maximize these benefits?
Recall that economists always need to keep certain variables static in order to study the impact of a change in another variable or multiple variables. This approach, known as ‘ceteris paribus,’ is not quite as easy as some may think. Why? Variables are NEVER static, or ‘ceteris is NEVER paribus.’ (more…)
London Calling: LIBOR Revisited and The Greenback
Posted by Larry Doyle on May 24th, 2009 8:27 AM |
The biggest developments in the market and economy this week were the decline in the value of our greenback and the move higher in long term interest rates (10yr U.S. government bonds moved to 3.46%, a level not seen since last Fall).
Despite these concerns, many analysts will point to the drop in Libor (London interbank overnight rate) as an indication of the increased confidence in the global banking system. I strongly disagree.
I believe the drop in Libor is not a reflection of the “fundamental” improvement in our global banking system, but rather a “technical” reflection of the supply of dollars that have been injected into the global economy. There is an enormous difference in these lines of reasoning and the implications they have for our markets and economy going forward.
If Libor were declining because of a “fundamental” improvement in the global banking system, it would be reflected in an increased flow of credit into the economy. That flow is not happening.
If Libor is declining because of a “technical” supply of dollars, then it would be reflected in a decline in the value of the dollar, an increase in long term interest rates, an increase in the prices of select commodities (gold has rebounded to $957/oz, oil is back above $60/barrel), and other inflation-related variables. Yes, we are seeing all of these developments.
Let’s revisit my post from May 15th, What Is Going On With Libor?
While many analysts were promoting the drop in Libor as a positive, I begged to differ and wrote:
Has the drop in Libor coincided with an improvement in the credit markets? No. Despite what pundits would tell you, credit spreads remain at elevated levels. In fact, on an inflation adjusted basis, rates are at the highest levels since the early 1980s.
Why aren’t banks lending as much? Lack of confidence in the economy along with enormous embedded losses in their current book of loans. Those losses are real and will be rising. The elusiveness of bank credit is highlighted in a McClatchy article, Businesses Struggle as Bank Loans Remain Elusive, in the Newsworthy section of Sense on Cents.
Thus, if a drop in Libor is not a reflection of improved credit conditions, what does it mean?
In my opinion, it is a precursor to a drop in the value of the dollar. Why?
Very simply, too many greenbacks floating around. A decline in the value of the dollar is inflationary. Both core rates of producer prices and consumer prices reported this week were higher than expected. I’ll be watching.
Please recall, there are always three factors that determine the level of a market: fundamental, technical, psychological. A move in Libor is almost always analyzed from a fundamental standpoint. However, in our Uncle Sam economy, we need to be increasingly diligent in reviewing all three of the aforementioned factors along with the implications they have for our global markets as we navigate the economic landscape.
LD
P.S. In light of the Memorial Day holiday, I will not be hosting NQR’s Sense on Cents with Larry Doyle this evening. I look forward to getting back at it next week. If you have any questions or topics you would like addressed, please do not hesitate to leave them and I will respond. Enjoy!! LD
