Posted by Larry Doyle on November 27th, 2009 8:29 AM |
Will the government of Dubai default on its debt? Will that trigger a wave of defaults in other nations or in selected companies? With Dubai situated in the oil-rich Middle East, how could this nation be on the precipice of default?
Thanks to kbdabear for sharing with us this unsettling story from The Times.co.uk, Dubai in Deep Water as Debt Crisis Spreads:
Fears of a dangerous new phase in the economic crisis swept around the globe yesterday as traders responded to the shock announcement that a debt-laden Dubai state corporation was unable to meet its interest bill.
Shares plunged, weak currencies were battered and more than £14 billion was wiped from the value of British banks on fears that they would be left nursing new losses.
Nervous traders transferred the focus of their anxieties from the risk of companies failing to the risk of nation states defaulting. Investors owed money by Mexico, Russia and Greece saw the price of insuring themselves against default rocket.
If Dubai were to default, it would be the first nation to default on its debt since Argentina in 2001. Whether Russia in 1998, Argentina in 2001, Dubai currently, or a number of countries in the future, the weight of unbearable debt forces default. The fact is, this overwhelming debt burden is not localized but truly global in nature. Situations like Dubai should not surprise us. In fact, I would be surprised if we do not witness more nations facing default. (more…)
Posted by Larry Doyle on November 11th, 2008 2:30 PM |
I will admit that, given the current dynamics at work in the economy and the markets, I have become somewhat numbed as to the magnitude of some of the developments. Many of the highlights that I will offer from yesterday’s news would be enormous stories in and of themselves. Taken collectively, they do become overwhelming if we let them.
The markets are down 5-6% on the month. Given the stream of negative news, one might think that the market could be even lower. The fact that markets aren’t even lower is testament to the trillions of dollars that have been put to work by governments around the world.
Let’s review the major stories of November 10, 2008:
1. China implemented a $563bln economic stimulus plan primarily to further develop infrastructure in the country. That figure represents 1/5th of their total GDP. I was surprised to hear that, but it also indicates to me how much growth potential that country possesses. This package had an immediate impact on our equity markets this morning when our markets were up 3%. This package also supported commodities, especially copper which bounced about 5% on the day. Aside from infrastructure, China directed this stimulus package to an area that was badly damaged in a recent earthquake. Last but not least, China offered “tax deductions” on the purchase of certain hard assets. (Are you listening, Barack??)
This stimulus package though indicates to me that it is not likely that many of our domestic companies will likely be receiving capital injections from sovereign wealth funds. With oil at $60, oil producing countries (such as Dubai) may need to support the real estate developers and exporters in their own countries.
2. Fannie Mae reported a loss of $29bln (I’m not going to say earnings when companies lose money) which equates to $12.96 a share vs an expected loss of $1.40 a share. (How can Wall St. analysts maintain credibility when they miss a call by almost 1000%?).
It is amazing how Fannie can rack up losses like this when their own incentive bonuses are not on the line and when collectively Uncle Sam owns them. Aside from this loss, Fannie did announce that they expect losses to continue and to increase into 2009. This to me means they see foreclosures increasing over the next 6 months. More than likely Fannie will have a negative net worth by the end of 2008 requiring an increased capital injection by the U.S. taxpayer. Where does it end!!
Again, this model is broken. The American consumer who is able to get a mortgage is being subsidized at the expense of the taxpayers. Let the private market set the mortgage rates and if the housing market re-prices, so be it. Enough socialized housing finance. (more…)