RSS Feed
Twitter
Facebook
Email
HomeWhen Big Ben Speaks….
Posted by Larry Doyle on January 14th, 2009 9:40 PM |
Against the backdrop of the frozen tundra, numerous members of the storied Pittsburgh Steelers franchise have reached
Chairman of Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke
legendary status. Included in this family are such greats as Jack Lambert, Mean Joe Greene, Terry Bradshaw, Rocky Bleier, Franco Harris, John Stallworth, Lynn Swann, Chuck Noll, and the longtime owner Art Rooney. For lovers of the NFL, these men are true giants. The current Steelers franchise is led by budding legend and All-Pro quarterback Ben Roethlisberger. When “Big Ben” leads, Pittsburgh follows. You can discuss this “Big Ben” tonight and every Wednesday night at 9PM on “No Topic Taboo . . . Everything Else with Jay.”
With all due respect to Mr. Roethlisberger, though, there are two other “Big Bens” that crossed paths just yesterday and hold much greater sway and impact in world affairs. I speak of Ben Bernanke and the famous London clock tower.
While the NFL is a great diversion, we ultimately return to the real world and need to deal with the realities it presents. Fed chairman, “Big Ben” Bernanke, presented chilling testimony yesterday in the shadows of the famous clock tower at the London School of Economics.
Understand that every message delivered by a Fed chairman is very carefully scripted. In years past, the Fed was much less transparent than it is today. That said, the Fed chairman speaks carefully so as not to unsettle markets but also to provide an outline as to future policy. In so doing, the general public is often hard pressed to decipher what he is saying and what it means. The general media typically does not capture the nuances and subtleties offered by the Fed. To that end, our work here at No Quarter looks to fill that void.
Got Insurance? 529 Plans? Financial Aid? Read On . . .
Posted by Larry Doyle on January 13th, 2009 5:10 PM |
At the request of numerous readers, I am offering a transcript review of my interview this past Sunday evening with insurance and financial planning expert, Sean D’Arcy. Additionally, if you’d like to listen to this interview in its entirety, just click on the Play button below for the audio recording. Once the playback has started, you can fast forward or rewind to any portion of the show by clicking at any point along the play bar. Archived programs are also available as a podcast from iTunes.
As a disclaimer, the opinions offered are Sean’s alone. The transcription is mine. I have no vested financial interest in Sean’s business or any of the views or companies mentioned. The purpose of providing this recap is strictly as a public service. To the extent that you find this material beneficial, my mission is accomplished. If you find this material helpful, please forward it along. If we grow our audience in the process that would be great!
Sean is a self-employed independent insurance and financial planning executive. He is a graduate of Columbia ’81.
LD: Sean, can you address how the insurance industry is regulated?
SD: The insurance industry is regulated by 50 separate state insurance offices. Each of those offices is responsible for the oversight of insurance business done within their state. Some states are very disciplined in this process, for example New York has very strong oversight. Other states are clearly lacking in the professional expertise to properly oversee insurance business within their state. Each state insurance commissioner is appointed by the respective governors. Each state insurance office is funded by a tax on the premiums written in that state. For example, New York imposes a 4% tax on each policy written in the state. An emergency fund is also put in place to address potential funding problems with individual companies.
Market Musings on a Monday
Posted by Larry Doyle on January 12th, 2009 10:05 PM |
With so many cross-currents in our economy and markets, it is little wonder that people feel overwhelmed and disoriented. The powers-that-be in Washington are in a period of transition with plenty of backroom dealing going on from both a political and economic standpoint. The financial markets remain challenged from a liquidity and valuation standpoint. Against these backdrops, I hope readers are becoming more comfortable with my analysis of the economy, the markets, and the world of finance at large. Let’s dive into the issues and topics I find most compelling.
Earnings and Outlooks
On the equity front, the bottom line — that being earnings — is ultimately what drives prices. Time and time again we will hear analysts and money managers “talk their positions.” These individuals are either blinded by the big picture or talking the party line. In our piece on January 8th, “Time, Why You Punish Me?” I stated that “earnings expectations truly concern me.”
Fast forward to today and we see that Citigroup is leaking information into the market that their Q4 2008 earnings will be significantly worse than expected. Initially, Citi’s Q4 2008 earnings (why do we still use that term? They have not made money in so long. Wouldn’t it be better to merely call them losses and save ourselves the headache?) were expected to be -$4 billion. Citi is now leaking to the market that earnings will more likely be -$6 billion and that is only because they are recognizing a gain of $4 billion on the sale of a German retail banking business. Thus, ex that sale, Citi had a $10 billion operating loss for the Q4 2008.
“Where’s The Money??….!!”
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 29th, 2008 6:38 PM |
I thought about providing an outlook for 2009. I considered offering further opinions on Obama’s economic plans. Perhaps a review of the Bush economic program would be well received. Then yesterday, the lead editorial in my local newspaper asked “Where did the bailout money go?” I had my answer. In previous pieces I have touched upon why I thought there was a very good chance why this money would not flow through the system. I hesitate to continue to refer back to my piece published on November 12th (The Wall St. Model is Broken…and Won’t Soon be Fixed), but for new readers I do firmly believe it is as good as anything I have read or seen in any publication in explaining how we find ourselves in our current position.
Please allow me to digress for a second. I will admit that I am not a movie buff, but I do enjoy films that focus on the success of underdogs, have a measure of financial intrigue, or perhaps a combination of the two. Not surprisingly, a few of my favorite movies are, Rocky, Jerry Maguire, and The Sting.
Everything’s Negotiable
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 23rd, 2008 7:15 AM |
At “Central Station” the other day, a loyal reader thought it may be useful to write about the implications of defaulting on a mortgage. Certainly nobody wants to default on a mortgage, but given the dynamics of our current housing market and economy, delinquencies and defaults are simple realities.
In thinking through this topic, it struck me that it may be just as beneficial to address what to do before defaulting as it is to know what happens after defaulting.
First and foremost, given the economic environment there should be no sense of shame or embarrassment in a deteriorating financial condition. That said, as one of my earliest mentors taught me “people in finance typically do not have problems with losses but they have big problems with surprises.” How does that piece of wisdom apply to today’s deteriorating housing market and rising foreclosures?
Economic/Market Highlights . . . 12/17: “The Golden Rule”
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 18th, 2008 7:00 AM |
For time immemorial, nations and economies have operated by the Golden Rule. Well, in this economy and this market, that Rule is strong and seemingly getting stronger. While the U.S. dollar sank to a 13yr low vs the Japanese Yen and declined another 2+% vs the Euro, gold moved higher by another 2+% and is now at a 9 week high and up 9% for the year.
In speaking with an investment advisor today, he told me that he has moved almost 20% of his fund into gold in anticipation of continued declines in the value of the dollar.
While gold is increasing in value, we are not seeing other commodities follow its lead. In fact, oil (down 7% on the day) intraday went below $40 per barrel, while copper dropped to a near 4yr low. Through the grapevine, a close friend shared with me today that Goldman is long oil in SIZE from a very large transaction with Mexico. Both commodity moves indicate to me that the market believes the economy will bump along the bottom for the foreseeable future.
What is going to get us to turn the corner on the economy? The Fed has done all it can monetarily, and will clearly utilize “quantitative easing” in buying longer maturity mortgage, consumer, and corporate assets. There is another $350 billion in TARP funds, some of which will likely be directed towards helping homeowners on the brink of foreclosure.
Beyond that, all eyes in Washington and across the country are looking toward a MASSIVE economic stimulus. Obama has already indicated the outlines of his plans with the largest component being infrastructure.
Will this be the “magic bullet” that we all hope? It would be foolhardy to think that $300 billion, if not $500 billion, and perhaps $1 trillion, would not give a serious jolt to our economy. That said, will a package of the size and type being discussed by Obama revolutionize the art of stimulus packages and lead us to a viable and sustainable economic recovery? I think not. Why? (more…)
IT’S EASY TO FIND FAULT…especially if you’re clueless!!
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 11th, 2008 10:10 AM |
Given the pressure applied by the general public on elected officials who passed the $700bln dollar TARP (Treasury Asset Repurchase Program) it is not surprising that those very elected officials are now openly critical of Treasury. Nothing like casting a few aspersions to keep the crowd back home somewhat at bay. This statement is not to say that Treasury has not fumbled in certain aspects of this program. That said, as I have tried to highlight, there are so many holes to fill that one single, albeit massive, “tourniquet” is not going to cover an entire body riddled with life threatening wounds.
Read how “Watchdogs Chide Treasury on Bailout“…
For Congress to think that the economy would see near “immediate” positive reaction to the injection of capital into the system is both naive and ignorant. I am going to guess that most Congressmen failed Economics 101.
IMO Treasury should not have played “whack a mole” but should have proactively highlighted the areas of need throughout the system. In properly managing expectations it is always better to be as comprehensive as possible and simultaneously “under-promise and over-deliver”. Paulson and Bernanke along with Paulson’s boy wonder, Neel Kashkari, have played way too much defense and not enough offense. The risk they ran in this regard, though, is that they may have “spooked” the markets and “scared” the public. (more…)
Obama’s Economic Stimulus Plan: Big Dig Deja Vu??
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 7th, 2008 8:00 PM |
In the midst of the current economic turmoil, virtually every economist worth his salt can make valid cases for the necessity of both fiscal and monetary stimulus. I appreciate the use of PEBO’s use of the term “investment” rather than “spending” in proposing an economic stimulus program not seen in this country since the New Deal.
Read more here as to Obama’s Stimulus proposal, “Obama Outlines Stimulus Plan.”
I hope, though, that in proposing an “investment” program, that he is mindful of certain parameters that any qualified private or public investor would utilize prior to making his investment. What are those parameters?
1. With whom am I doing business?
2. As the investor (lender), what is the credit rating of the investment and of the borrower?
3. What is the “time to maturity” … that is when can I expect to generate a return on my investment dollars? (more…)
What Has Meredith Whitney Got to Say?
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 11th, 2008 6:20 AM |
You have heard me sing the praises of those whom I consider to be some of the wisest minds in the financial markets. Included in this group are Nouriel Roubini, Laszlo Birinyi, Sheila Bair, and Meredith Whitney. It is not often that we have the opportunity to hear timely, insightful, and extensive analysis from these individuals. This morning we have one of those opportunities as Meredith Whitney, the TOP bank and financial services analyst on Wall St., is interviewed.
This attached video clip of her interview runs 12 minutes but it is extremely insightful on the current state and future outlook for the following:
1. Consumer Credit….it is going to get MUCH tighter, which is the very reason why we are STRONGLY encouraging people to pay down debt.
2. Outlook for large money center banks….”on life support for the next 18-36 months”
3. AIG….needs more money as they have incurred ANOTHER 10bln loss. (more…)
Tags: Meredith Whitney, Meredith Whitney commentary, Meredith Whitney speaks, Meredith Whitney speaks on banks
Posted in American Consumers, Current Affairs, Economic Stimulus, Economy, Meredith Whitney | 1 Comment »