« Obama Sells Out Literature for “Informational Texts” in Asinine Educational Program . . . MUST READ
Dick Morris Outlines Obama’s Tax Plans
Posted by Larry Doyle on September 21, 2012 3:40 PM |
I will leave it to readers to make their own assessments as to what they think of Dick Morris’ assessment of President Obama’s tax plans. However you lean — and before people unsubscribe from my blog — do yourself the favor of viewing this 4-minute clip.
Regardless of your political persuasion, I think that even a whiff of these tax programs can do nothing but put a significant dent into the economy while elevating the unemployment rate .
I would imagine tax proposals of these sort would be a cause for a battle royale atop Capitol Hill. Are these redistribution plans that President Obama hopes he may have greater flexibility to implement in a second term?
What do I believe should be done?
As laid out a week ago in the WSJ by George Shultz, Michael J. Boskin, John F. Cogan, Allan H. Meltzer, and John B. Taylor (not exactly lightweights) in writing The Magnitude of the Mess We’re In,
Today, government officials are issuing debt to finance pet projects and payoffs to interest groups, not some vital, let alone existential, national purpose.
The problems are close to being unmanageable now. If we stay on the current path, they will wind up being completely unmanageable, culminating in an unwelcome explosion and crisis.
The fixes are blindingly obvious. Economic theory, empirical studies and historical experience teach that the solutions are the lowest possible tax rates on the broadest base, sufficient to fund the necessary functions of government on balance over the business cycle; sound monetary policy; trade liberalization; spending control and entitlement reform; and regulatory, litigation and education reform. The need is clear. Why wait for disaster? The future is now.
The authors are senior fellows at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. They have served in various federal government policy positions in the Treasury Department, the Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers.
Comments, questions, constructive criticisms encouraged and appreciated.
Navigate accordingly.
Larry Doyle
ISN’T IT TIME to subscribe to all my work via e-mail, an RSS feed, on Twitter or Facebook?
I have no affiliation or business interest with any entity referenced in this commentary. The opinions expressed are my own. I am a proponent of real transparency within our markets so that investor confidence and investor protection can be achieved.
RSS Feed
Twitter
Facebook
Email
Home












Get ready because look what is coming right around the bend.
REDISTRIBUTION..baby!!! Looking to spread the wealth around.
The one issue is how to engage the voter.
We have/are losing our democracy/government and the media reports the “news” on the most profitable fashion. (is journalism dead!?!).
Everything flows from there.
No doubt about it and the political power base KNOWS this and has worked very hard at owning that piece of the process.
Control the medium and then you can control the message.
It is so evident watching the conventions and listening to the drivel coming from both candidates mouths (as well as the media).
The candidates and the talking heads are singing from the big donor hymnals, dividing the electorate to get elected (or get their guy elected) but all the while the influence peddlers have gamed the process (playing all sides against us) so their nests remain feathered. We truly are f-cked.
I had hoped to find an objective commentator in your column. I must ask how you see Dick Morris as anything other than another Sean Hannity or Bill O’reily?
Is Fox News really a good source for commenting on the economy, in your mind?
The Hoover foundation is recognized as being right leaning, much as the Cato Institute or Heritage Foundation, both arms of the Koch brothers.
I do appreciate your past responses, but I really am searching for objective, well thought out conversations on the issues of the day.
Fox News isn’t it.
LP,
I had hoped for more from you than a simple dismissal of Dick Morris as a “hack”.
Unless Mr. Morris mistated the “Obama Plan” tax facts, I think the video clip cut through some of the political rhetoric and presented some of the “pocketbook” reality of the cost of an Obama re-election to the 49%ers.
Personally, I’d like more information on how these tax dollars will be used to reduce the deficit and similar tax and spending information from the Romney camp.
American voters deserve no less.
According to the US Government Printing Office, our Tax Code is 13,458 pages in total. The full text of Title 26 of the United States Code (the part written by Congress–available for an additional $179) is a mere 3,387 printed pages, bringing the adjusted gross page count to 16,845.
I can imagine that more than a couple hundred pages apply to the vast majority of Americans.
The 16,845 page tax code is the legacy of both democratic and republican presidents.
The resulting gargantuan tax code begs the question – who benefits from the remaining 16,500 pages of tax codes and resulting loopholes?
Peter,
In response to your post, if I’m not mistaken Romney wants to lower the rates and broaden the base. According to Morris and w/o facts to the contrary, Obama wants to increase the rates and increase the base.
If your objective is to simplify the tax code Romney would seem to be the better choice?
Fred, my objective is exactly I stated, who and what entities benefit from the remaining 16,500 pages of the U.S. Tax Code.
An objective examination may reveal loopholes and unintended consequences that benefit a minority of Americans over the greater American majority.
I personally believe that a much similar progressive flat tax would be far more equitable, instilling a belief fare play.
The remaining 16,500 pages only perpetuate the notion that “the fix is in.”
Peter,
I’ll go a step further, If it doesn’t fit on 1 page it’s too much!
1) No video link to click on. Make your site compatible with Flash Blocker software.
2) re AMT: and I have to pay the accountant $50 just to do the AMT paperwork, to prove that I’m NOT subject to it…
Please help Barack spread his thoughts on his faith by sharing this video with your friends: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28
It astounds me that so much focus is on the POTUS office in regards to tax law. It is your Congressman and Senators who write the lax laws. They are the ones who insert the tax loopholes for their sponsors. The POTUS doesn’t make tax law. He can scream and shout about it. But at the end of the day, it is Congress’s job.
I think Mr Morris, or anyone else babelling on about Obama’s or Romeny’s tax plans is just a distraction. They are political shills yammering about something that prez has no control over while Congress continues to loot our country and sell us out to the highest bidder.
Lets put blame where is belongs. At the feet of Congressman who can’t figure out how to do their job.
I agree with Fred, I’m for Mitt Rommney.. John,Torrance,Ca