« Christie on Education: “How Disgusted I Am”
Auction Rate Pain Continues: February 14, 2008 to February 14, 2012 Recommended »
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 12, 2012 5:34 PM |
In a nation now all too familiar with a “too big to fail” banking system, a heavily manipulated and high frequency dominated equity market, and an incestuous financial regulatory system, we should not be surprised with a mortgage settlement that does little more than ‘piss into the wind’.
Pardon my cynicism, but one does not need to look too deeply into the recently announced mortgage settlement to understand there is little in the way of meaningful justice embedded in this contrivance. Has America become so numb to the news emanating from both Wall Street and Washington that we expect so little and receive less than that when it comes to real justice? I believe we have.
If the mortgage settlement were derived from shoddy mortgage servicing practices at the five institutions (Ally Financial, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo), then how is it and why is it that the executives running those business units are not singled out in this settlement and handled accordingly?
I believe it defies logic to think that the mortgage servicing units within these institutions were not fully aware of the practices (robo-signing of documents and the like) ongoing at each bank and perhaps jointly shared information. Would that sharing of information be considered a conspiracy and ultimately a form of racketeering? Did these institutions actually violate the Racketeering Act? I posed that question during 2011, but we see nary a whisper of that sort in this settlement.
What do we see? Very little actually.
As the American Banker highlights, Missing Settlement Documents Raise Doubts About $25B Deal:
That’s because a fully authorized, legally binding deal has not been inked yet. The implication of this is hard to say. Spokespersons for both the Iowa attorney general’s office and the Department of Justice both told American Banker that the actual settlement will not be made public until it is submitted to a court. A representative for the North Carolina attorney general downplayed the significance of the document’s non-final status, saying that the terms were already fixed.
“Once the documents are finalized, they’ll be posted to nationalmortgagesettlement.com,” the representative said in an email toAmerican Banker. Other sources who spoke with American Banker raised doubts that everything is yet in place.
A person familiar with the mortgage servicing pact says that a settlement term sheet does not yet exist.
Does this sound like “declare victory, take a ceremonious lap, and rely upon an uninformed American public to buy a bill of goods”? You bet. Do not think for a second that the funds involved in this settlement will provide meaningful relief for the housing market. The settlement funds represent mere pennies on the dollar in terms of the overall negative equity within American homes.
Additionally, do not discount that homeowners who receive some of these funds will spur other current homeowners to forestall making their own mortgage payments. More unintended consequences and subsequent foreclosures in the process. Why is it that mortgage investors who will suffer from principal reduction programs also bear some of the costs of this settlement? The cost of this component will be borne immediately by investors and ultimately by higher mortgage rates for all.
When you add all of these shortcomings, misfirings, and injustices together, the simple fact is this mortgage settlement is at best justice deflected, more accurately justice neglected, and in summation justice denied.
As American Banker concludes:
“Even once we get to the final terms, the servicers we’re told are going to be allowed to develop their own plans,” says NCLC’s Thompson. “They’re going to have three months to develop those from when the settlement is approved by the court. We are a long way in lots of ways from being able to kick the tires.”
Why does this happen? Two reasons:
One, our Washington political establishment is currently more driven in its pursuit of any and all funds that might be injected into the economy than anything else.
Two, can’t you just picture the heads of the banking institutions involved in this settlement chuckling about this settlement knowing that “these regulators and pols really work for us.”
Pissing into the wind in America 2012. How pathetic!
Navigate accordingly!!
Larry Doyle
Isn’t it time to subscribe to all my work via e-mail, RSS feed, on Twitter or Facebook?
Do your friends, family, and colleagues a favor and get them to do the same. Thanks!!
I have no affiliation or business interest with any entity referenced in this commentary. The opinions expressed are my own. I am a proponent of real transparency within our markets, our economy, and our political realm so that meaningful investor confidence and investor protection can be achieved.
LD – I think you again are hitting the nail on the head…while I believe the confluence of financial excesses contributing to the 2007 crisis and the last several years of global uncertainties and myriad challenges, there can be no doubt that a great deal of the trauma starts right in the backyard of the US residential mortgage market…I think that the 25B fines levied on the big five originators/servicers is a slap on the wrist – the folks that paid and continue to pay the price will see very little relief…yes, the currencies of these sifi banks have been battered – but I don’t see any clawback of the executives’ pay packages – nor does it seem they will be fired , no less serve jail time…and, by the way, the practices that set this process up go on to this day – my unemployed 20-something daughter gets 10 credit card solicitations a month given her great FICO scores…the CEO of a local bank solicits customers to refi into a low cost Arm – but the devil is in the details and the details are very sketchy…too big to fail – indeed …how about too unethical to care for customers! just pay the money and sweep everything under the rug…the banks won’t look back – but the damage done on a personal level is too big to cure!
LD,
A housing related comment.
Maybe the reason housing numbers are improving isn’t because a bottom is in place, maybe it is because cities and towns are approving more building permits so new housing revenues will offset losses due to housing price declines. Builders are taking advantage of lower cap rates thanks to ZIRP and increased financing availability.
Sales(property tax receipts) = Units X Price
The theory being pursued, what’s lost in price is made up in units.
The problem, the only way cities and towns have been able to avoid municipal(Meridith Whitney) bond defaults has been by neglecting routine maintenance and deferring capital spending projects, thereby reducing new financing needs.
On the one hand we have an increasing need for muni financing due to new housing supply and on the other hand we have all the deferred spending and maintenance needs that don’t go away but will only become more critical and expensive.
Something has to give! Let’s hope it’s not the overburdened and antiquated water main or electic grid.
What we need is well thought out fiscal managerial leadership, what we continue to get instead are politicians and gov’t officials unable and/or unwilling to do what’s necessary.
Tom Brown, a well regarded banking analyst had the following to say about this mortgage settlement,