Subscribe: RSS Feed | Twitter | Facebook | Email
Home | Contact Us

Multiplication Isn’t Stimulating and Stimulus Isn’t Multiplying

Posted by Larry Doyle on July 17, 2009 12:31 PM |

What 3rd grade kid ever really enjoyed the multiplication tables? Every youth in Boston would race through those tables in order to get outside and play some street hockey, a much more stimulating experience!!

In a slightly perverse way, I think many participants on our economic landscape would prefer some form of youthful entertainment because President Obama’s Stimulus Plan is not creating any sort of multiplier for our economy.

Bloomberg takes the offensive in reporting, Obama Stimulus Fails to Reboot Economy as No Multiplier Effect:

The debate over whether the $787 billion stimulus package is sufficiently large or efficiently designed obscures a broader question, some economists say: Can any fiscal measure pull the economy out of the recession?

With credit still crimped and the outlook for consumer demand gloomy due to rising unemployment and increased personal saving, no amount of government intervention will be able to stanch the hemorrhaging of jobs and quickly ease the U.S. out of its deepest recession in a half-century, they said.

Why hasn’t the government stimulus gained traction, attracted significant private capital into the economy, and spurred the economic multiplier? In my opinion, for the following reasons:

1. Obama’s basic economic premise is the redistribution of wealth implemented across virtually every economic program and proposal. He won the election and he is entitled to put forth his plans. Whether the plans work or not is for the market to decide. So far, that question remains unanswered but the Stimulus is receiving very poor grades.

2. The markets, whether for housing or other assets, are not being allowed to clear. What does that mean? Assets are not being transferred from weaker hands to stronger hands backed by private capital in a timely fashion. Why? Uncle Sam is propping up individuals and institutions which could not now, nor should they ever, have financed the purchase of these assets. The result is that prospective buyers of these assets are compelled to hold off injecting new private capital because the overhang of current supply and future supply is weighing on the market.

3. The government money is akin to one large ‘pool’ of water but there is very little ‘current’ given Uncle Sam’s plans which not only crowd out private capital but will also heavily tax potential new pools of private capital.

I am personally aghast why more people are not talking about the impact on our economy and markets from the virtual certainty of higher taxes. Those tax increases will be a further drag on an already sluggish economy.

What would Sense on Cents propose to attract private capital and generate a multiplier effect from government stimulus? Do not punish the private capital, but rather embrace it. Promote transparency across markets so the private capital is protected. Provide incentives for the private capital to work with currently distressed homeowners and business owners. How so? Lessen, delay, or defer taxes so the private capital will work with these individuals or businesses. Provide further incentives for the private capital to hire new employees.

In short, the risk takers who have the capital to create the multiplier which our economy so badly needs must be rewarded and not punished.

Why won’t this happen? That approach flies in the face of Obama’s redistribution plans. While Obama and the Democratic Congress did not even have time to fully read the Stimulus Bill prior to its passage, now:

Obama administration officials such as Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said the measure needs time to work and are appealing for patience.

OK Tim, let’s go over the 9 times table…

LD

  • fiscalliberal

    Regarding -certainty of higher taxes

    That discussion was relevant when the republicans were in complete control, yet they kept on spending and cutting taxes. Cheney said deficits did not matter, Wall Street and the Investment banks cheered on.

    Bill Clinton had the guts to raise taxes and the deficit declined dramatically. He did it by working with Gingrich to reform welfare and raise taxes.

    I would suggest that Obama does not have the guts to raise taxes. So the way you get debt is decrease the value of the dollar and pay it off with cheaper dollars.

    Regarding the stimulus – let us consider that this is being timed to have the situaiton better during the next election, not in the short term

  • fiscalliberal

    🙂

    Re- Obama redistribution plans.

    Did the Jesuits or Nuns talk about Jesus administering to the poor, saying give up your wealth and follow him.

    Obama probably learned that from Reverend Wright and just thinks he is doing the lords work.

    Modern day Robin Hood

    🙂

    • Larry Doyle

      I like where you are going with this. The parable in the Good Book that I appreciate is the story about what one does with the ‘talents’ given to him by the good Lord.

      Go forth and multiply those talents is the message…

      No proselytizing intended but for those who care,

      Stewardship of Talents






Recent Posts


ECONOMIC ALL-STARS


Archives