Subscribe: RSS Feed | Twitter | Facebook | Email
Home | Contact Us

How Does One Lose $125 Billion?

Posted by Larry Doyle on February 24, 2009 6:00 AM |

It’s as easy as A-I-G…

While the government has pumped billions of dollars into Freddie, Fannie, the banks, the auto companies, and on and on it goes, the largest single government intervention into a private company centers on AIG. How are our investment dollars doing? Bloomberg.com reported:

“While I anticipated AIG would come back to the government begging for additional taxpayer dollars, I am disturbed that it has happened so soon,” said U.S. Representative Elijah Cummings, the Maryland Democrat who has criticized the insurer’s retention pay program, in a statement today.

The government saved AIG from collapse to prevent losses at banks that did business with the insurer.

“Counterparties around the world continue to have significant exposure to AIG, and market conditions continue to be fragile and sensitive to the potential disorderly failure of AIG,” the Fed said in a report in November.

It is expected that AIG may announce a loss of upwards of $60 billion when it reports earnings next week.  In anticipation of that, AIG is expected to request a further injection of capital to stem losses. Where do those losses emanate? CDS, those insurance contracts written by AIG to banks and funds around the world. This intricate web of contracts represents the massive systemic risk that truly is the centerpiece of our global financial problem. American taxpayers are stuck with the tab and will be paying over the next number of years.

Where were the insurance regulators? This derivatives business – housed in AIG Financial Products – developed, initially thrived, and answered ultimately to Maurice “Hank” Greenberg. Hank has a reputation as one of the most ruthless individuals in the world of finance. It is believed by some AIG veterans that under Hank’s watch the books were cooked via a money laundering scheme centered offshore and executed through an office in New Hampshire. What happened?

Former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer forced Greenberg out of AIG but was never able to prosecute him. Why? Well, is there any doubt as to who exacted retribution on Spitzer and literally caught him with his pants down? 

The problems at AIG did not just occur in the last few years. The culture of that organization was developed and dominated by Greenberg. The AIG Founder Wielded Personal Influence in Washington and there is little doubt that those relationships saved him from prosecution for money laundering, tax evasion, and accounting fraud.

AIG stock closed at  .53 today. Greenberg is worth a pittance of his billions, but the American taxpayer is truly stuck with the bill.

To read more: AIG Seeks to Ease Its Bailout Terms

LD

  • fiscalliberal

    CNBC previously was giving Greenburg a pass, I wonder if this comes out, if they will continue to do that.

    It comes down to the fact that we have been acting like a bannana repulic, with all of our corruption in business and government.

    This CDS stuff is fraud and should be prosecuted, however we bail it out.

    Do you want people to use this site now????

  • fiscalliberal

    To comment farther – Rahm Emanual was Nancy Pelosi’s direct line to K street for fund raising. Now they have a direct line to the White House – just like Greenburg did with Bush.

  • Thanks for the insights.

    Please use the site!!

    I hope you enjoy the site. I personally like the links to a lot of the Economic All Stars. The Thought Leaders link provides connections to a wide array of very thoughtful and influential people.

    I do think that there is something for everybody here. I have links to primers on one end and some of the finest economic minds in the world on the other.

    Enjoy!! Thanks again for your support!!

  • Many people think that you need a lawyer or a specialized loan modification company to do a loan modification when in fact the banks care very little who does the loan modification whether it be you or a third party they just want them to be submitted correctly , The banks are having a hard time keeping up with all of the loan modification requests and it was reported that in 2010 the main reason for them denying 70% of loan modification applicants was due to the lack of correct documentation that they requested during the loan modification process. So why pay a lawyer 300 dollars an hour when you can do a loan modification your self .






Recent Posts


ECONOMIC ALL-STARS


Archives