Subscribe: RSS Feed | Twitter | Facebook | Email
Home | Contact Us

Will Whistleblower Protections Suffer at Hands of Rep. Michael Grimm “Reaper” (R-NY)?

Posted by Larry Doyle on February 7, 2012 11:14 AM |

Representative Michael Grimm (R-NY) was ceremoniously inducted into the Sense on Cents Hall of Shame in May 2011. Not that I ever believed there was reason to doubt his induction, but recently I witnessed further reason to cement his status in the elevated ranks of shame.

As regular readers are fully aware, I write passionately about pursuing the truth while promoting investor education and investor protection. The history of the last few years has shown that the financial services industry has not exactly shared our passion.

Who has shared the passion and took very real professional risk in the process? Numerous and sundry whistleblowers. 

Not that each and every whistleblower possesses the keys to unlock every instance of corporate malfeasance, but in my experience I have learned that whistleblowers display remarkable courage while taking real professional risk. They deserve our admiration, gratitude, and protection.

Are we to be so naive to think that Wall Street banks will provide whistleblowers that admiration, gratitude, and protection? Are you kidding me? Let’s navigate this dark and winding road along our economic landscape.

Against this backdrop, I write about the efforts of our aforementioned Congressman from New York, Michael Grimm, who continues to do the bidding for the large Wall Street banks. How so? As the Project on Government Oversight recently highlighted in writing, Guard Whistleblower Protections from Wall Street:

It’s the old bait and switch again. Name a bill the exact opposite of what it actually does to try and sneak it through. This time it’s the Whistleblower Improvement Act (H.R. 2483), introduced by Rep. Michael Grimm (R-NY), that is designed to dismantle current financial sector whistleblower rights and protections.

We’ve been fighting to keep whistleblower protections strong, but now Grimm’s bill is receiving support from Wall Street and a new “shoe-leather lobbying campaign” from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Grimm’s bill would severely undermine the fledgling whistleblower programs at major financial regulatory institutions such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Industry whistleblowers reporting wrongdoing to the SEC and CFTC are one of the best ways to catch the future Madoffs and Enrons.

Under the proposed bill, whistleblowers would be required to report problems internally before going to outside regulators—this would be like requiring police officers to tip off suspects before they begin an investigation. The bill would also deny many would-be whistleblowers the right to a financial reward for reporting wrongdoing, a key incentive to get insiders to come forward.

Wrapping these destructive policies in the guise of protecting whistleblowers is a cruel joke to all the whistleblowers who risked their careers and livelihoods to report wrongdoing and save investors billions of dollars.

Don’t let Rep. Grimm and big-moneyed lobbyists overpower the whistleblower community. Make your voice heard so lawbreaking companies don’t escape accountability.

Whom do you trust to provide real investor protection? A self-regulated financial services industry having a track record in this realm which would make anybody blush? Or would you like to see individuals such as Harry Markopolos, Sherron Watkins of Enron fame, and MANY more be given the protections necessary to allow them to come forward?

Do you want to cast your vote with Mr. Grimm “Reaper” or the Project on Government Oversight?

Sense on Cents compels us to support POGO and call out Representative Grimm for once again displaying the qualities which strike me as endemic to those engaged in the Wall Street-Washington Incest and got him inducted into our Hall of Shame in the first place.

Sense on Cents will continue to monitor this proposed legislation closely in the hopes that we can reap real protection for financial whistleblowers everywhere.

Larry Doyle

Isn’t it time to subscribe to all my work via e-mailRSS feed, on Twitter or Facebook?

Do your friends, family, and colleagues a favor and get them to do the same. Thanks!!

I have no affiliation or business interest with any entity referenced in this commentary. The opinions expressed are my own. I am a proponent of real transparency within our markets, our economy, and our political realm so that meaningful investor confidence and investor protection can be achieved.

  • Peter S.

    To the soul selling Rep. Grimm,

    Let me suggest that your efforts to endanger would be whistle blower is an act of a coward. Your duty is to protect the American Public from the collusive fraud that only a truth-teller can expose. You took an oath as a United States Congressman only to have sold your soul so to enrich your coffers and ensure your future employment after the majority of your constituents realize your utter lack of moral fiber.

    I was a whistle blower. I and others confronted management with our concerns regarding securities fraud taking place at our firm for over two years. Management was not impressed. When the firm’s cover-up began, I chose to go public. I then got a brick smashed over my head. Ultimately my whistle blowing played a pivotal role exposing a fraud that was pillaging the retirement and college savings plans of, mom, pop, and child mutual fund shareholders of billions of dollars their savings annually.

    Yes I lost my career, my marriage, and my home – but not my resolve. See bad things happened with my whistles blowing that were never discovered. That is the rest of the story.

    But back to you Rep Grimm. A whistle – blower is someone who is willing to stand up, despite knowing the enormous risk involved, so to expose an evil that is harming their neighbors. A rat is someone who after being caught in a nefarious act, turns on his co-conspirators for the singular reason of lessoning the consequences of his own actions. I can only imagine that you Rep. Grimm, when your charade as a congressman is complete, and you return to the private sector to collect on your true purpose, will be all too quick to scurry into that little hole.

  • fred

    Maybe the scope of the Congressional Stock Act can be expanded to include ‘ill-gotten gains’ from lobbying efforts.

    Let’s take a look at the ‘operating expenses’ of all registered lobbyists and follow the food chain.

    For example, are super bowl tixs legal and/or tax deductible expenses for the lobbyist? Did Joe Congressman include the value of those super bowl tixs as income?

    Why should a Congressman be allowed to be ‘legally’ influenced by lobbyists for either gifts, cash, or post congressional employment?

    I don’t see any difference between drug company percs to doctors and lobbyist percs to a Congress person. Percs cost the public whether in higher costs of medications or through higher costs from legislation.

    What percs did Rep. Grimm receive from lobbyists?

  • Peter Sivere
  • Mark J. Novitsky

    WARNING! – The more “attractive” or pleasant a piece of legislation being sold sounds the more concerned the average citizen needs to be about reading the fine print. Somebody has to. For instance the 2004 “American Job Creation Act” that incentivized outsourcing and imports while not containing a single element about the creation or preservation of a single American job. But it sounded good. How’d that work out? Or the “PATRIOT ACT” / no explanation necessary. Or the “Protect America Act” that gave immunity to Tele-Coms / Contractors involved in Telephone / Electronic Domestic Surveillance even in the event of “willful misconduct”. Who’s “willful” misconduct is being immunized?…use some common sense.

  • Dan Chilton

    Mr Grimm falsely argued that whistleblowers would bring frivilous complaints in search of profits. He failed to point out that – unlike civil suits, the DA decides if the case has merit.
    People can get fired or laid off if an employer even thinks you might be or become a whistle blower.

Recent Posts