US Supreme Court Declines to Hear Standard Investment v FINRA
Posted by Larry Doyle on January 17, 2012 4:54 PM |
In the fall of 2009, I was asked by some Washington based attorneys if I was aware of a case known as Standard Investment Chartered v FINRA. I informed them that I did not know the case.
These attorneys shared with me information that seemed to expose that the merger of two regulators to form Wall Street’s current SRO FINRA was predicated on a proxy statement that included misinformation. I was enormously intrigued and tracked the case closely, including paying a visit into the federal courthouse in New York to observe a hearing on this case.
The crux of the case was that executives of FINRA improperly represented information in the proxy statement used for a merger of the NASD and the regulatory arm of the NYSE. In the midst of my pursuing this story, I interviewed one of the attorneys bringing the case. That attorney, Richard Greenfield, pulled no punches in questioning the integrity of Mary Schapiro and other former FINRA executives. In fact, in a recap of my interview, I wrote in October 2009 Attorney Richard Greenfield Brands Mary Schapiro and FINRA Execs as “Liars”:
Greenfield comments on some interesting connections between Bernie Madoff and Mary Schapiro, former head of FINRA and current head of the SEC.
– Documents provided by the NASD (now known as FINRA) to Greenfield and his colleagues show unequivocally that the NASD defendants lied to the NASD member firms regarding distribution of funds from the sale of the Nasdaq.
Greenfield reiterates that these individuals lied blatantly and unequivocally. They intentionally lied. The lies are repeated over and over in a proxy statement provided to the member firms. The lies were repeated at roadshows which took place all around the country.
Who is they? Who lied? Who repeated the lies?
Mary Schapiro and senior officers in the NASD (FINRA)!!! > The primary lie is the misrepresentation of the maximum proceeds that could have been paid to the NASD member firms. That figure was represented as being $35k when in fact it could have been much, much higher.
Pretty heavy stuff!!
The attorneys for the plaintiff had appealed the case all the way to the United States Supreme Court. The supporting documentation included a reference to work here at Sense on Cents.
I most recently had written about this case two weeks ago inquiring if we would learn, in 2012, the answer to a question that lies at the core of this case, that is, Did Mary Schapiro Engage in a Fraud?
Alas, today we learn from a WSJ report that the High Court Declines to Weigh In on FINRA’s Immunity.
I believe that is a real shame. Why? I strongly maintain that if the case were to be heard it would have provided the key to unlocking the regulatory capture of our financial services industry, or as I have often defined the Wall Street-Washington Incest.
Do I regret so actively pursuing this story? Not in the least. Tracking this case was an education unto itself. That education provided the framework for real ‘sense on cents’. The education is also embodied in the voluminous chapters embedded in the link at the end of that last paragraph.
I STRONGLY encourage every American to save, store, and review the stories in that link. In the process, I think you will learn how and why I have come to believe that the large protected interests on Wall Street have joined forces with their crony capitalist brethren from both sides of the aisle in Washington to serve their own mutual interests at the expense of the American public.
Do your friends, family, and colleagues a favor and get them to do the same. Thanks!!
I have no affiliation or business interest with any entity referenced in this commentary. The opinions expressed are my own. I am a proponent of real transparency within our markets, our economy, and our political realm so that meaningful investor confidence and investor protection can be achieved.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 17th, 2012 at 4:54 PM and is filed under FINRA, General. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.