Volcker and Lewitt Drop Bombs on Financial Regulatory Reform
Posted by Larry Doyle on July 12, 2010 11:28 AM |
Will financial regulatory reform truly change the Wall Street landscape and insure that America never again experiences the economic crisis of the last few years? While we will likely see a number of our political operatives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and on Capitol Hill waving flags and banging drums when the reform measures are inevitably passed, let’s listen to some political and financial insiders who have a different take.
Paul Volcker, former Fed chairman and current White House economic adviser, is clearly looking to clear his name prior to the passage of this reform. He spoke at length in an article released by The New York Times, Volcker Pushes for Reform, Regretting Past Silence. Paul dropped the following bomb:
When it comes to interpreting the financial legislation, Mr. Volcker says he remains less than impressed. “We have to have a regulatory system that reflects today’s problems and tomorrow’s potential problems,” he says. “This bill attempts to do that. Does it do it perfectly? Obviously it does not go as far as I felt it should go.”
In a similar vein, the Financial Times addresses the upcoming financial regulatory reform in an article this morning. The FT’s John Plender writes, Tackling Anti-Social Financial Behavior:
On the topic of shareholder democracy, corporate governance and anti-social behaviour, I cannot do better than quote Michael Lewitt of Harch Capital Management on Dodd-Frank: “The financial reform bill that is emerging from Congress leaves so much essential work undone, and is so obviously a sell-out to special interests and expensive Wall Street lobbying efforts, that it can only be considered the latest example of all that is wrong with the American political system. In addition to leaving untouched the single biggest threat to financial stability – naked credit default swaps – it also fails to address the bleeding ulcers of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, ignores the deficiencies of the rating agencies and leaves most of the details of financial reform to be filled in by regulators, whose record in effectively doing their jobs is, to put it more politely than it deserves, pathetic.”
Mr Lewitt was prescient about the financial crisis. For my money, he is also on the mark here.
I would concur. We should not get overly comfortable thinking this reform as drafted will necessarily prevent another crisis.
This entry was posted on Monday, July 12th, 2010 at 11:28 AM and is filed under General. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.