Subscribe: RSS Feed | Twitter | Facebook | Email
Home | Contact Us

Wells Fargo Calls for More Socialized Housing Finance

Posted by Larry Doyle on September 16, 2009 9:26 AM |

What does one do when your bank is the largest mortgage originator in the country, has outsized exposure to an array of toxic mortgage loans (pay-option ARMs and the like), and is located in the heart of the weakest real estate market nationwide? Call Ghostbusters . . . that is, call on Washington to further tap the wards of the state known as Freddie and Fannie in an attempt to offload this risk and future risk on the American taxpayer. Of whom do I speak? Wells Fargo, led by CEO John Stumpf, called for just such actions in a recent interview with the Financial Times, Wells Fargo Urges U.S. to Boost Mortgage Market.

The FT writes:

The US government should help revive the moribund market for big mortgages by getting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to buy large home loans from banks, the chief executive of the lender Wells Fargo urged on Tuesday.

In an interview with the Financial Times, John Stumpf, whose bank originates a quarter of all US mortgages, called for an increase in the size of loans purchased by Fannie and Freddie, the troubled finance groups controlled by the authorities.

Mr Stumpf said such a move would help reduce the interest rates charged by banks on so-called “jumbo” mortgages and revive a market for higher-end housing that has been devastated by the credit crunch.

Fannie and Freddie can currently buy or guarantee mortgages worth up to $417,000. The stimulus plan approved last year set the companies higher limits of up to $729,750 in certain high-cost areas such as California until the end of 2009. Congress has to approve any extension of those higher limits.

Be mindful that Freddie and Fannie have already been approved to purchase conforming loans with loan-to-value ratios of up to 125% and are also purchasing jumbo mortgage product in certain regions of the country. The simple fact is our domestic mortgage finance market can now be defined as nothing short of socialized finance.

CEO Stumpf’s call for a further extension of this socialized housing finance is nothing more than a veiled attempt to offload risk from Wells Fargo onto the American taxpayer. In the process, risk based pricing for Jumbo mortgages will not be properly aligned and the American taxpayer will eat larger losses now and in the future.

At what point will capitalism actually be given a chance?

LD

Related Sense on Cents Commentary:
Barack and Barney Look to Further Plunder Freddie and Fannie (June 22, 2009)

  • In addition to this Larry, along very similar lines, today we also have the National Association of Realtors (NAR) asking Congress to increase and extend the homebuyer tax credit from $8,000 to $15,000, AND, extend it “at least” through next summer. What’s another $50 – $100 billion, right? Then next summer when home sales still haven’t turned around yet (and we have a lot more foreclosures) they can increase it again to, what, $25,000? $50,000? As you said Larry, our domestic mortgage finance market (and basically our residential real estate market) is officially socialized. Maybe the U.S. government can just buy every single foreclosed home on the market nationwide, indefinitely, and then be the landlord for all of those tenants! Why don’t we just do that!

  • Here’s the article on the NAR demanding an extension and an increase on the homebuyer tax credit:

    http://www.businessinsider.com/realtors-demand-new-100-billion-housing-subsidy-2009-9






Recent Posts


ECONOMIC ALL-STARS


Archives