RSS Feed
Twitter
Facebook
Email
HomeNASD Knew Auction Rate Securities Weren’t Cash
Posted by Larry Doyle on May 11, 2009 10:45 AM |
Everybody knows Auction Rate Securities (ARS) were cash or cash-like, correct? FINRA certainly did NOTHING to protect investors from the ARS sales and marketing scam perpetrated on investors.
FINRA spokesman Herb Perone would like to wash his hands and those of FINRA of any negligence or incompetence in regard to FINRA’s investments in Auction Rate Securities. The easiest manner of washing one’s hands is to point the finger at the entity which initially made the investment, in this case the NASD (National Association of Securities Dealers). If you recall, FINRA was formed in mid-2007 from the regulatory arms of the NYSE and NASD. In any event, Perone tries to deflect culpability on FINRA’s part in the recently reported Bloomberg story (FINRA Oversees Auction-Rate Arbitrations After Exit) highlighting FINRA’s sale of their Auction Rate Securities prior to the market’s implosion leaving thousands of investors and billions of dollars frozen. Bloomberg reports:
“The market was functioning normally when NASD was investing in these securities,” Perone said. At the time, auction-rate securities “were viewed as high-quality cash equivalents and as acceptable investment for institutions,” he said.
Perone further offers:
“It was for cash that we needed to have parked for a temporary period of time,” Perone said. “It was common to take cash you needed to hold and put it in auction-rate securities.”
If ARS were viewed as high-quality cash equivalents, why didn’t the NASD actually account for them in that manner? The NASD goes out of its way in its Annual Reports for 2003-2005 to highlight the fact that ARS were not cash or cash-like.
From page 38 of the NASD’s 2005 Annual Report, published on May 10, 2006:
Available-for-sale investments also include investments in auction rate securities, which are either preferred stock or bonds with interest rates that reset periodically, typically less than every 90 days, based on a Dutch auction process. Given the longer-term maturities of these securities, they are classified as available-for-sale investments, rather than cash and cash equivalents.
From page 30 of the NASD’s 2004 Annual Report, published on April 29, 2005:
Available-for-sale investments also include investments in auction rate securities, which are either preferred stock or bonds with interest rates that reset periodically, typically less than every 90 days, based on a Dutch auction process. Given the longer-term maturities of these securities, they are classified as available-for-sale investments, rather than cash and cash equivalents.
From page 27 of the NASD’s 2003 Annual Report published on June 7, 2004:
Available-for-sale investments also include investments in auction rate securities, which are either preferred stock or bonds with interest rates that reset periodically, typically less than every 90 days, based on a Dutch auction process. Given the longer-term maturities of these securities, they are classified as available-for-sale investments.
I have been questioning whether FINRA was negligent, incompetent or both in regard to their investment in ARS. FINRA could not have been negligent. Their parent organization, the NASD, lays it out in three separate Annual Reports that ARS were not cash or cash equivalents.
Thus, FINRA was merely incompetent in not protecting investors, as is its mandate!!
How may this be adjudicated? It is now speculated that Uncle Sam may establish a liquidity facility which investors can tap to get their money. This liquidity facility may be part of a larger government entity. I do hope this facility is enacted and that ARS investors can receive a timely return of their funds.
However, to whom does the obligation and cost shift? The American taxpayer. Once again, the taxpayer may pick up the tab for an activity (the sales and marketing of ARS by banks and investment managers) deemed a fraud by federal judges.
LD
We have seen how much damage companies that are too big to fail did to our country. What about regulatory agencies that are too big to be questioned or investigated? Are they too big to be accountable to the people they are supposed to be protecting? Are they above the law? Certainly the bankers that are on the FINRA board knew exactly what ARS were, they were selling them. Why are there contradictions in Perone’s statement about FINRA’s use of ARS. How long are they going to attempt to cover this up? Why was FINRA silent when it came to passing on this vital information to the public? If they had a little integrity and did their job they would have saved 146,000 investors from a robbery. Who were they protecting, not us?
Was all this known by the big banks that settled. Curios about the snake oil being brought down from 250k to 25k.
Oppenheimer, redeem your auction rate victims, you criminals. Redeem them now. You pitched this junk as cash, and then were openly hostile to many of your clients after the market crashed. You tried to intimidate us. Many rightly compare you to the Mafia.
E*Trade, you three steps below Pond Scum douche bags, redeem your auction rate victims, you criminals, and hucksters. No morality or ethics, responsibility to everyone you screwed notwithstanding, Redeem them now. You pitched this junk as cash, and then were openly hostile to many of your clients after the market crashed. You tried to intimidate us. Many rightly compare you to the Mafia.
Oppenheimer is also currently being sued by the state of Oregon for misrepresenting their 529 plan for the state of Oregon – their “core bond fund”. Five other states are also investigating Oppenheimer currently for this. They represented this as a “conservative” bond fund, when they in fact invested it into toxic mortgage backed securities, and failed to disclose to investors that they had done that. The core bond fund lost 40% last year – pretty big loss for a “conservative” bond fund, and led to huge losses for 529 plan investors in Oregon and many other states.
I’m stuck in auction rates, but I don’t think the taxpayers should bear the burden. I think it should be on the thieves that perpetrated the fraud, including apparently FINRA.
FINRA or NASD obviously had owned ARS since at least 2003. Soooo, why did they all of a sudden unload in 2007, before the market began to tank? That’s the $330 BILLION question.