Archive for the ‘Tim Geithner’ Category
Posted by Larry Doyle on November 18th, 2009 9:35 AM |
Do you have any confidence that Washington even knows how to properly address our massive and growing fiscal deficit? Rahm Emanuel, Tim Geithner and others understand that from a political standpoint they need to start talking about deficit control, but will that talk lead to action?
Do you think Congressional leaders, specifically Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, have the character and fortitude to ‘tighten the belt?’
The first real test for this crowd is already upon us. How so? The TARP, with a $700 billion commitment, expires on December 31, 2009. Of that $700 billion, $400 billion has actually been spent. Why wasn’t the other $300 billion spent? Well, don’t forget that Obama’s Stimulus Bill totaled $770 billion and assorted other programs implemented by Treasury have run into the trillions. As a result, Geithner did not immediately need to allocate those funds.
The question begs as to what will happen to that $300 billion. While Emanuel and Geithner are starting to ‘talk’ the fiscal discipline ‘talk,’ will they ‘walk the walk?’ (more…)
Tags: allocating TARP funds, Deficit, deficit control, Fannie Mae, FDIC, FHA, fiscal discipline, Freddie Mac, GMAC, Harry Reid, insurance companies, Nancy Pelosi, Rahm Emanuel, richard trumka, Senator John Thune, stimulus bill, talk of fiscal deficit, TARP, TARP funds, TARP renewal, Treasury, walking around money
Posted in Deficit, General, Tim Geithner | 3 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on October 29th, 2009 9:52 AM |

FDIC Head Sheila Bair
“Too big to fail.”
Do you think the American public is sufficiently sickened by that phrase? No doubt.
How will our ‘wizards in Washington’ handle this monstrous issue going forward? Is there any doubt that the industry itself should be held accountable to provide the necessary capital to unwind firms deemed ‘too big to fail?’ Of course not. However, the execution of that policy is where the rubber meets the road and where we learn who in Washington is truly working for the American public and who is working for the financial industry. How so? Let’s navigate. (more…)
Tags: Bair Breaks With Obama Urges Preepaying Costs to Unwind Firms, FCRF, FDIC, Financial Company Resolution Fund, Sheila Bair, systemic regulator, systemic risk, Tim Geithner, too big to fail, unwinding firms too big to fail
Posted in Bank Failure, Banking Institutions, General, regulation, Sheila Bair, Tim Geithner | 4 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on October 5th, 2009 12:40 PM |
“You can’t handle the truth!!”
While the above line by Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men may have made for good theatre, it makes for lousy public policy. Regrettably, Uncle Sam has utilized that approach in its initial disbursement of funds via the TARP (Troubled Asset Recovery Program). That opinion is not strictly mine (although I do agree with it), but rather that of Neil Barofsky, the inspector general charged with overseeing the bank bailouts.
The New York Times sheds light on Barofsky’s feelings this morning in writing, Inspector’s Report on Bailouts Says Treasury Misled Public:
The inspector general who oversees the government’s bailout of the banking system is criticizing the Treasury Department for some misleading public statements last fall and raising the possibility that it had unfairly disbursed money to the biggest banks.
A Treasury official made incorrect statements about the health of the nation’s biggest banks even as the government was doling out billions of dollars in aid, according to a report on the Troubled Asset Relief Program to be released on Monday by the special inspector general, Neil M. Barofsky.
There is NO doubt that Uncle Sam, in the persons of Hank Paulson, Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner, Larry Summers et al, has little confidence that the American public can handle the truth about the overall health of our banking industry.
That said, the lack of transparency and integrity as highlighted by Mr. Barofsky does not come without a cost. What is that cost? Lessened confidence in our regulators and our markets going forward.
I addressed these very topics of financial regulatory transparency and integrity on my radio show last evening. In the process of interviewing former SEC attorney Genevievette Walker-Lightfoot, I made the following comment in regard to the statement put forth a month ago by SEC Inspector General David Kotz dealing with the SEC’s failures on the Madoff investigation. I said:
If that is the kind of face saving self-serving approach, people are going to call foul on it. The real cost is, and I think we are bearing this cost right now whether with the SEC or with FINRA, if you’re not going to be honest with us how can we fully trust that you’ll be honest on a going forward basis?
Now I’ll grant you I guess we don’t have much choice. What are we going to scrap the entire SEC or scrap the entire FINRA and start from scratch? Some people may say that’s what we want to do, but that’s obviously not going to happen.
It does get to the point where there’s got to be total transparency. There’s got to be total integrity. There’s got to be total accountability and if people haven’t done the job or are incapable of doing the job then you know what, for the long haul – and I’m not talking about the next six months but rather the next ten, fifteen, twenty years – people got to go and other people got to come!!
Genevievette Walker-Lightfoot responded:
“I agree. That’s true.”
How about you, what do you think? Can you handle the truth? Wouldn’t you like to be given the opportunity?
LD
Note: the views expressed by Genevievette Walker-Lightfoot during last night’s show are her own personal views and do not in any way reflect her position as an employee of the Federal Reserve Board.
Tags: bailouts, banks, David Kotz, FINRA, Hank Paulson, integrity, Madoff, Neil Barofsky, New york times Inspector's Report on Bailouts Says Treasury Misled Public, regulation, regulators, SEC, SIGTARP, TARP, Tim Geithner, transparency, truth, Walker-Lightfoot, Wall Street, Washington
Posted in General, Henry Paulson, TARP, Tim Geithner | 1 Comment »
Posted by Larry Doyle on August 14th, 2009 8:23 AM |
Treasury Secretary Geithner has adapted to Washington very quickly. How so? His willingness and ability to distort and conceal the truth is consistent with much of what emanates from our nation’s capital. I literally gagged upon reading the extremely superficial commentary in today’s Wall Street Journal, Geithner Sees Good Vital Signs:
U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said the Obama administration wouldn’t allow Wall Street to return to such old habits as taking on excessive risk, and that plans to overhaul financial-market regulation were on track.
Does Secretary Geithner think that people do not monitor these issues? His statements in this article are the equivalent of a Wall Street bond salesman’s assertion “trust me on this,” while jamming an overpriced security down his client’s throat. My response, “challenge!!” Let’s navigate.
Geithner asserts:
“I don’t think the financial system is reverting to past practice, and we won’t let that happen,” Mr. Geithner said. “The big banks are running with much less leverage now, much more conservative liquidity cushions, there’s been a significant shrinking of their balance sheets, getting rid of bad assets (LD’s highlight) and cleaning up. And the weakest parts of the system don’t exist anymore.”
Sense on Cents challenge: the system is chock full of toxic assets. The new-issue securitization market for consumer assets remains largely dormant and the TALF and PPIP programs are largely a joke. I submit “PPIP: A Virtual Odd Lot” (July 7, 2009).
The Wall Street Journal continues: (more…)
Tags: Geithner adapts to Washington practice of distortiing the truth, Geithner addresses financial regulatory reform, Geithner addresses need for better regulatory oversight, Geithner conceals the truth, Geithner has never publicly addressed FINRA, Geithner has not addressed regulatory reform for rating agencies, Geithner promotes Federal reserve as uber-regulator, Geithner says trust me, Geithner says Wall Street risk is addressed, Geithner Sees Good Vital Signs, Geithner talks about financial regulatory reform, Geithner talks about regulation for credit cards and mortgages, Geithner talks about regulation for derivatives, Harry Markopolos, has Wall Street cleaned up toxic assets, has Wall street returned to business as usual, how are TALF and PPIP doing, Obama and team have lost momentum for financial regulatory reform, Toxic Assets, Wall street owns Washington, why doesn't Geithner speak to Harry Markopolos, why has Wall Street rebounded
Posted in General, regulation, Tim Geithner, Wall Street | No Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on July 20th, 2009 3:14 PM |

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner
Tim Geithner is anything but transparent. In fact, Geithner exemplifies what is wrong with government today.
Government officials who would not treat your money as they would their own are a VERY dangerous breed. These political animals come in both Democratic and Republican stripes. Despite what Geithner or other officials may say, there is mounting evidence of our government allocating funds, making fiscal decisions, and not promoting transparency in the process. It is no surprise that there is seemingly limited regard for our long-term fiscal deficit.
The public level of exasperation over this mounting deficit is growing and is reflected in regular polling data. Even today, I see more evidence of this fiscal imprudence which should be SHOCKING to the American public if it were properly highlighted and exposed.
The Wall Street Journal reports, Government Tab for Crisis Could Hit $23.7 Trillion, Official Says:
Government support aimed at cushioning the effects of the financial crisis in the U.S. could reach $23.7 trillion, a special inspector general overseeing U.S. bailout efforts planned to tell Congress on Tuesday.
In prepared testimony for a hearing of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky said the figure included spending and commitments for several agencies that have implemented programs aimed at supporting the economy and the U.S. financial system.
Last I had checked, the figure associated with Uncle Sam’s fiscal spending and commitments ranged in the $10-12 trillion range. Where and how might Treasury double that figure? Where is the transparency in the process? (more…)
Tags: Barofsky highlights lack of transparency by Treasury, fiscal imprudence, Geither is not transparent because he has no good news, government support could reach $23.7 trillion, Government Tab for Crisis Could Hit $23.7 Trillion, how big a loss under TARP, how much government support for financial crisis, how much has TARP lost, is Geithner and Treasury being transparent, is Treasury doubling its commitment to financial crisis, loss under TARP, Neil Barofsky, Neil Barofsky SIGTARP, Neil Barofsky testimony to House Committee on Oversight and Reform, no transparency at Treasury, no transparency in government spending by Treasury, Obama and geithner no regard for deficit, Obama team not transparent, SIGTARP recommendations, TARP watchdog, TARP Watchdog Neil Barofsky, TARP Watchog to Deliver Harsh Testimony, Tim Geithner and transparency, Treasury ignoring SIGTARP recommendations, Treasury not following transparency recommendations, what about the long term fiscal deficit, what is Geithner hiding, what is SIGTARP
Posted in General, Tim Geithner, transparency, U.S. Treasury | 3 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on June 2nd, 2009 11:43 AM |
Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner’s assertion to Chinese university students that “Chinese financial assets are very safe” in the United States was met with derisive laughter.
The Financial Times reports, Geithner Faces Tough Challenge to Win Round Skeptical China. Why are the Chinese skeptical? Could it be that they do not “trust” Tim and his minions?
In Tim’s defense, the Chinese lack of trust in the United States predates this administration. In fact, the lack of trust between the U.S. and The People’s Republic of China extends far beyond the financial arena. That said, the basis for financial transactions and integrity is trust.
The Chinese were extremely dismayed by the lack of support from the Bush administration for various investments made by the Chinese here in the United States. The jawboning by Chinese Prime Minister Jiabao prior to the G-20 still resonates. Are the Chinese trying to create leverage in the midst of ongoing negotiations? Always. Do the Chinese have reason for concern? Most assuredly.
As investors in our country, the Chinese have witnessed numerous violations of contracts, the diminution of property rights, the decline in the value of the dollar, and a major investor (Bill Gross) questioning our sovereign creditworthiness.
Against that backdrop, Secretary Geithner’s vows of future fiscal prudence and discipline currently ring quite hollow.
The ridicule and laughter expressed by these Chinese students is nothing short of, “Get real, Mr. Secretary. Don’t tell us you’ll protect our investments. Show us!!”
LD
Tags: Bill Gross questions U.S. credit rating, Chinese Laugh at Geithner, Chinese university students laugh at Tim Geithner, decline in value of dollar, diminution of property rights, do Chinese trust Geithner and Obama, Geithner and Obama promote fiscal prudence and discipline, lack of trust between China and United Statesd, Prime Minister Wen Jiabao, violation of contracts
Posted in China, General, Tim Geithner | 1 Comment »
Posted by Larry Doyle on May 28th, 2009 7:46 AM |
The move higher in rates and lower in the U.S. dollar is nothing more than the market response to Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner, and ultimately Barack Obama for the cards that they have already shown.
Managing one’s personal business and finances is anything but a game, but the manner in which Wall Street and Washington address economic and financial issues incorporates many aspects of “game theory.” As such, we need to adapt our own thought process and financial management accordingly.
Our leaders in Washington have shown many cards, including:
1. $780 billion Stimulus
2. proposed $3.5 trillion budget
3. multiple trillions in backstops to the financial industry (Sense on Cents’ link to Subsidyscope provides a wealth of info)
4. a trillion dollar plus commitment to quantitative easing targeted over a 6 month time horizon.
Be mindful that the “Washington wizards” are at the “table” and “playing the game” with borrowed funds. Each of us is also in the “game” whether we know it or not. We, along with foreign participants, are funding the window from which the wizards have to get the cash to stay in the game. The move higher in interest rates on the long end of our yield curve is nothing more than market participants (investors) “raising” the stakes on the “wizards.” (more…)
Tags: $3.5 trillion budget, $780 billion Stimulus, Bernanke purchasing assets, borrowing needs, economic and financial issues, game theory, market response to budget and fiscal issues, market response to Washington programs, move higher in rates, move lower in dollar, quantitative easing, Sense on Cents, Subsidyscope, Washington needs for funding, yield curve
Posted in Ben Bernanke, bond market, Economy, General, Tim Geithner | 4 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on May 6th, 2009 11:37 AM |
Can Barack Obama’s horses and men in the persons of Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, Paul Volcker, Rham Emanuel, Sheila Bair, and their minions put Wall Street together again? The glue and putty in the form of trillions of dollars of taxpayer funds and commitments is still wet. Mr. “Humpty Dumpty” Wall Street is still on the ground.
Humpty’s most severe injury is the breakdown of the securitization process in which Wall Street promoted a pure “originate to distribute” model. Obama himself offered in the May 3rd Sunday New York Times Magazine:
. . . we’re going to have to figure out what we do with the nonbanking sector that was providing almost half of our credit out there. And we’re going to have to determine whether or not as a consequence of some of the steps that the Fed has been taking, the Treasury has been taking, that we see the market for securitized products restored.
I’m optimistic that ultimately we’re going to be able to get that part of the financial sector going again, but it could take some time to regain confidence and trust.
Time for the cement to harden and for Humpty to get back on his feet. Why will it take so much time? Very simply, Humpty was not an honest broker in the process of originating, securitizing, and distributing poorly written – if not fraudulently written – loans over the last 5 to 7 years. The Financial Times highlights this fact this morning in “Securitization Is Crucial for Revitalizing Lending.” The FT reports:
Securitisation is a way to raise money by repackaging securities based upon underlying assets such as mortgages.
The US government is seeking to restart this market with up to $1,000bn of funding for purchases of securitised debt. But the complexity and risks involved mean it remains difficult to replicate the scale of the market that collapsed under the weight of losses and the departure of leveraged investors.
Meredith Whitney, of Meredith Whitney Advisory Group, says about $2,200bn less in funds has been raised by means of the US capital markets since the start of the credit crunch in July 2007, with $2,700bn less money raised globally.
She said: “With debt issuance to date seeing year-on-year gains, it is suggestive to say that things aren’t getting much worse. They just aren’t getting any better.”
The US government’s programme to revive securitisation – the Term asset-backed securities loan facility (Talf) – has made some funds available and it has also led spreads on some asset classes to narrow, reducing the potential funding costs. The programme works by lending money to hedge funds, which can increase the returns on triple A rated securities by means of the cheap loans.
In a sign of a big pick-up in demand, the Federal Reserve said late yesterday that investors requested $10.6bn worth of loans in its most recent round of the programme. This included $2.2bn worth of requests for auto loan bonds and $5.5bn for bonds backed by credit card loans.
If we review those statistics, the government’s TALF (Term Asset-Backed Lending Facility) has facilitated $18.5 billion in sales since its launch in March. While the Fed views the demand as picking up, be mindful that the $18.5 billion figure represents approximately .008 of the total credit that has evaporated from the economy via the shadow banking system. In layman’s terms, we just gave Humpty a swab with a warm cloth while his limb is holding on by a thread.
My concern with the TALF is that the buyers will cherry pick bank assets and simply purchase those which have the most rigorous underwriting. The dregs will be left for the banks and taxpayers to absorb.
If Uncle Sam does get Humpty somewhat propped back up against the wall (note that I’m not even hinting at Humpty getting “on the wall”), how do we make sure Humpty does not once again fall down and take us all with him?
We need to make sure Humpty plays by strict rules and regulations, both in terms of underwriting and business engagement. The FT addresses proposed underwriting rules in “Watchdog Proposes Strict Rules.” The FT reports,
Yesterday’s Iosco (International Organization of Securities Commissions) report called for minimum levels of due diligence by the originators and suggested mandating far greater disclosure to investors of what checks had been carried out. It also called for ongoing disclosure to investors of the performance of the underlying assets and for originators to be forced to hold on to some tranches of each deal.
Other proposals included imposing standards forcing originators to check that products were suitable for each investor and looking into developing alternative measures of assessing risk other than the credit ratings agencies that were relied on by investors previously.
Wow, you mean Humpty actually has to display a measure of integrity in his operations? What a novel idea! Who may be keeping an eye on Humpty to make sure he plays by the rules going forward? The SEC and FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority).
Hey, wait a second. When Humpty fell off the wall, we have very credible evidence that FINRA was actually one of his playmates. None other than Harry Markopolos said that FINRA was on the wall (“in bed”) with Humpty. I have highlighted issues within FINRA that still need to be addressed: FINRA Is Supposed To Police The Market.
President Obama, what do you prescribe for Humpty given his relationship with FINRA? Obama told the Times,
. . . the fact that we had such poor regulation means — in some of these markets, particularly around the securitized mortgages — means that the pain has been democratized as well. And that’s a problem. But I think that overall there are ways in which people have been able to participate in our stock markets and our financial markets that are potentially healthy. Again, what you have to have, though, is an updating of the regulatory regimes comparable to what we did in the 1930s, when there were rules that were put in place that gave investors a little more assurance that they knew what they were buying.
Putting Humpty back together is going to be very challenging. Sense on Cents will be monitoring the operation very closely.
LD
For newer readers who may want to more fully understand how Humpty “had a great fall,” I strongly recommend The Wall Street Model Is Broken….and Won’t Soon Be Fixed.
Tags: can Wall Street be rebuilt?, FINRA's relationship with Wall Street, International Organization of Securities Commissions recommendations, Meredith Whitney comments on capital markets, Obama interview in Sunday New York Times, originate to distribute, originate to distribute model, progress of TALF, protecting investors, rebuilding the nonbanking sector, rebuilding Wall Street model, rebuilding Wall Street's business, reconstructing Wall Street, repackaging loans, restarting the securitization processm, restoring the nonbanking sector, what's up with FINRA, will TALF work?, will Wall Street recover
Posted in FINRA, General, Mary Schapiro, SEC, Sheila Bair, TALF, Tim Geithner, U.S. Treasury, Wall Street | 8 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on April 10th, 2009 12:40 PM |
The movie Goodfellas provides a wealth of material for comparative analysis of the markets. The “insider activity,” the “fooling around,” “the payoffs,” and “the gambling” all make for great drama on the screen. Truth be told, one does not have to look all that hard to find striking similarities to certain activities in the world of Wall Street, and for that matter, Washington.
One of my favorite scenes in the movie occurs after the boys make the big heist. Immediately, the word is put out to keep your mouths shut and no indications of newfound wealth.
Back to reality. In terms of “putting the fix” into the world of our major money center banks, isn’t the relaxation of the mark-to- market the “newfound wealth”? Isn’t the “keep your mouths shut” the equivalent of the Treasury telling the banks not to comment on results of the Bank Stress Test? Speaking of the Bank Stress Tests, Bloomberg reports:
The U.S. Federal Reserve has told Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Citigroup Inc. and other banks to keep mum on the results of “stress tests” that will gauge their ability to weather the recession, people familiar with the matter said.
The Fed wants to ensure that the report cards don’t leak during earnings conference calls scheduled for this month. Such a scenario might push stock prices lower for banks perceived as weak and interfere with the government’s plan to release the results in an orderly fashion later this month.
Clearly the Fed and Treasury are trying to keep their “boys” quiet and lay low while the real regulators of the market, that being honest investors, are walking the beat.
If any of the boys talk, then the leaders of the family won’t be able to coordinate the stories and hoodwink the public.
Whatever happened to, “as long as you tell the truth, you don’t have to worry about having a bad memory”?
It seems we are operating much more in the realm of, “well, I can tell you but . . . ”

The Goodfellas: Henry Hill, Jimmy Conway, Paul Cicero, and Tommy DeVito
Henry . . . Jimmy . . . Paulie . . . Tommy . . .
Please let me know who in our government and world of finance are most appropriate to play each of these individuals? Let’s have some fun.
Tags: bank earnings, Bank Stress Test, Citigroup, Goodfellas, government tells banks to keep quiet about bank stress tests, Mark-to-Market, Tim Geithner
Posted in American Consumers, Bank Stress Test, Banking Institutions, Congress, Czech Republic, Economy, FASB, General, Global Finance, Risk, Tim Geithner, Toxic Assets, Wall Street | 6 Comments »
Posted by Larry Doyle on April 8th, 2009 11:35 AM |
Why is it urban school dropout rates are 50%? Well, I am sure there would be as many reasons for that horrendous statistic as there are dropouts. The fact of the matter is, though, the state of urban education has promoted a phenomena known as “social promotion.” If students aren’t qualified to do the work, testing has been gamed, standards have been lowered, and corners have been cut. As a result, urban education at this stage is an unmitigated disaster. What does this have to do with the current state of our economy and the world of finance? I am glad you asked.
If banks, much like students, are not required to pass rigorous testing, then “social promotion” in finance will produce results not unlike those in education–underperformance and ultimately an inability to compete on the global stage.
Against that backdrop, I personally looked forward to the results of the Bank Stress Tests. Let’s finally get an honest assessment of the “students.” Let’s see how they have performed and let’s project to see how they will perform!!
As with any test, the results are only meaningful if the process and proctor have unquestioned integrity. The proctors for the Bank Stress Test are none other than Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Fed chair Ben Bernanke. Why is a testing authority of the magnitude of FDIC, led by Sheila Bair, not more involved in the process? Ms. Bair is the one individual in our country with the greatest level of interaction with and understanding of the student body, that being the banking industry as a whole and individual banks specifically. (more…)
Tags: Bank Stress Tests, Basell II, Ben Bernanke, FDIC, Sheila Bair, social promotion, Tim Geithner, transparency of bank stress tests
Posted in Bad Bank, Bank Failure, Bank of America, Bank Stress Test, Banking Institutions, Business, Commerce, Economy, FDIC, General, Reputation, Sheila Bair, Tim Geithner, Wall Street | 6 Comments »
All The King’s Horses and All The King’s Men . . .
Posted by Larry Doyle on May 6th, 2009 11:37 AM |
Humpty’s most severe injury is the breakdown of the securitization process in which Wall Street promoted a pure “originate to distribute” model. Obama himself offered in the May 3rd Sunday New York Times Magazine:
Time for the cement to harden and for Humpty to get back on his feet. Why will it take so much time? Very simply, Humpty was not an honest broker in the process of originating, securitizing, and distributing poorly written – if not fraudulently written – loans over the last 5 to 7 years. The Financial Times highlights this fact this morning in “Securitization Is Crucial for Revitalizing Lending.” The FT reports:
If we review those statistics, the government’s TALF (Term Asset-Backed Lending Facility) has facilitated $18.5 billion in sales since its launch in March. While the Fed views the demand as picking up, be mindful that the $18.5 billion figure represents approximately .008 of the total credit that has evaporated from the economy via the shadow banking system. In layman’s terms, we just gave Humpty a swab with a warm cloth while his limb is holding on by a thread.
My concern with the TALF is that the buyers will cherry pick bank assets and simply purchase those which have the most rigorous underwriting. The dregs will be left for the banks and taxpayers to absorb.
If Uncle Sam does get Humpty somewhat propped back up against the wall (note that I’m not even hinting at Humpty getting “on the wall”), how do we make sure Humpty does not once again fall down and take us all with him?
We need to make sure Humpty plays by strict rules and regulations, both in terms of underwriting and business engagement. The FT addresses proposed underwriting rules in “Watchdog Proposes Strict Rules.” The FT reports,
Wow, you mean Humpty actually has to display a measure of integrity in his operations? What a novel idea! Who may be keeping an eye on Humpty to make sure he plays by the rules going forward? The SEC and FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority).
Hey, wait a second. When Humpty fell off the wall, we have very credible evidence that FINRA was actually one of his playmates. None other than Harry Markopolos said that FINRA was on the wall (“in bed”) with Humpty. I have highlighted issues within FINRA that still need to be addressed: FINRA Is Supposed To Police The Market.
President Obama, what do you prescribe for Humpty given his relationship with FINRA? Obama told the Times,
Putting Humpty back together is going to be very challenging. Sense on Cents will be monitoring the operation very closely.
LD
For newer readers who may want to more fully understand how Humpty “had a great fall,” I strongly recommend The Wall Street Model Is Broken….and Won’t Soon Be Fixed.
Tags: can Wall Street be rebuilt?, FINRA's relationship with Wall Street, International Organization of Securities Commissions recommendations, Meredith Whitney comments on capital markets, Obama interview in Sunday New York Times, originate to distribute, originate to distribute model, progress of TALF, protecting investors, rebuilding the nonbanking sector, rebuilding Wall Street model, rebuilding Wall Street's business, reconstructing Wall Street, repackaging loans, restarting the securitization processm, restoring the nonbanking sector, what's up with FINRA, will TALF work?, will Wall Street recover
Posted in FINRA, General, Mary Schapiro, SEC, Sheila Bair, TALF, Tim Geithner, U.S. Treasury, Wall Street | 8 Comments »