RSS Feed
Twitter
Facebook
Email
HomeUpon Further Review
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 26th, 2009 3:02 PM |
The FDIC just released its 4th quarter 2008 report. Read it and weep . . .
1. FDIC had a $26bln loss in the 4th quarter and now has only $18bln in reserves. (Little doubt that FDIC premiums — insurance premiums that banks must pay — will be increasing to rebuild reserves. All costs ultimately flow through to customers). In fact in today’s WSJ, FDIC Poised to Double Fees Charged to Lenders.
2. banking industry had first loss in 4th quarter 2008 since 1990
3. troubled institutions rose to 252 from 171 in 3rd quarter
4. banks have taken a total of $750 billion in writedowns on problem assets!!
5. banks have increased loan loss reserves to $69 billion from $32 billion
These numbers in conjunction with the Bank Stress Test lead me to make the relatively easy projections that:
— Government will have significant stakes in certain major institutions while continuing to take over and shut down many smaller institutions.
— Banks will continue to look to build reserves against future losses. This development along with a limited if not nearly non-existent “shadow banking system” (securitized consumer loan market) will mean that credit will be tight.
— As banks need to preserve capital, their ability to recruit and pay people will be severely restricted. I know employees are looking to leave these organizations to work at smaller shops without these problems.
— Although bank stocks are currently getting a bounce given government indications of support, these are not companies that have attractive growth prospects under these conditions.
LD
Ceteris Paribus
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 26th, 2009 2:01 PM |
Economic and budgetary analysis by their very nature often employ a “ceteris paribus” approach or similarly base line assumptions. Ceteris paribus, translated as “all other things being equal,” or base line assumptions are necessary given the fact that economic analysis has so many variables. Well, let me share with you that ceteris are NEVER paribus and base line assumptions are almost always skewed to bias the results in a desired direction.
***UPDATE: I was not aware at the time of my writing but it is reported that the Obama administration is projecting the economy will grow at a 3.2% GDP in 2010. That assumption is wildly optimistic. No respected economist would project that figure. Consensus has it in the 1.5-2% range. What does this mean? Well, lower growth means lower revenues, means higher deficits, means greater funding needs, means more borrowing, means higher government interest rates, means more “crowding out”, means slower growth for the economy going forward!!
There was little doubt about President Obama’s social agenda and economic platform during his campaign. While markets will somewhat discount campaign rhetoric, they do not discount economic reality. The markets are sending a strong signal that Obama’s economic proposals and proposed budget are anything but pro-growth. Obama Delivers $3.6 Trillion Budget Blueprint runs the risk of raising taxes at a time of economic distress. Raising taxes was a prime factor that increased the economic malaise in the 1930s. Obama is willing to take that risk as he sticks to his campaign plan and is pressured by the liberal wing of the Democratic Party. (more…)
Going “All In”
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 26th, 2009 10:59 AM |
The government yesterday released the specifics of the Bank Stress Test to be undertaken by the 19 major banking institutions in our country. Those details in conjunction with the testimony provided this week by Treasury Secretary Geithner and Fed chair Bernanke provide a very clear signal as to the government’s approach to our economic problems. In my estimation they are clearly indicating they are going “all in!”
Before we get to the market reactions, allow me to share insights from a highly regarded bank analyst and then comment myself.
Most analysts and economists view the government’s worst case scenarios under the bank test as not much more severe than what many already expect. I’m an optimist by nature but live by the mantra of hope for the best, prepare for the worst. The market will discount the government’s worst case. (more…)
Does Larry Need a Stimulus?
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 25th, 2009 4:37 PM |
The Financial Times reported that Larry Summers fell asleep on the podium this past Monday at the Financial Responsibility Summit:
Although Lawrence Summers, head of the National Economic Council, fell asleep on the podium, most attendees, including Republicans, appear to have appreciated the exercise.
While I know that some of this material can be a little dry, one would hope it is not putting Larry to sleep!!
I’ll admit I fell asleep once or twice in science class, but I always made sure I was in the back of the room. Perhaps Larry already felt comfortable with the material.
You can’t make this stuff up…I only hope he passes the test!!
LD
Is The Market Oversold?
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 25th, 2009 2:40 PM |
The valuation of any asset is determined by three factors:
1. Fundamentals: measures items such as cash flow analysis, cost-benefit analysis, earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation (EBITDA)
2. Technicals: measured by regression of price movements to determine overbought and oversold conditions
3. Psychology: measured by unscientific surveys of market participants
I have never seen such divergent views on expected future earnings which directly impacts any reasonable fundamental analysis. (more…)
Put Your Brokers and Bankers in Competition
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 25th, 2009 12:00 PM |
Every global financial enterprise has been hard pressed to maintain, let alone grow, revenues given the economic turmoil. With assets held in portfolio experiencing increasing levels of delinquencies and defaults, these institutions are all forced to set aside more reserves. How do businesses respond? Cut expenses and increase fees wherever and however possible. Who pays? You!!
I regularly see a sleight of hand at work on behalf of banks, insurance companies, money managers and other financial intermediaries to generate greater fees. While you will regularly be solicited with new and improved product offerings, how often are you getting the call that a fee is being increased and you may want to shop around for a better rate.
In an attempt to help you navigate this landscape, I strongly encourage you to approach your brokers and bankers and request a grid-like structure highlighting the basic products on one axis and the fee structure on the other axis. While more structured products and specialized services can be worthy of higher fees, a whole host of basic products fall into the plain vanilla category. (more…)
Caveat Emptor
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 25th, 2009 8:49 AM |
The equity markets across all sectors have gotten off to a very rocky start for 2009 (down 15% on average). In the midst of that, a lot of institutions and individuals have fled to the safety of short term government funds, money market funds that now benefit from a government backstop, and other cash alternatives. On average, these investments pay Wall Street and fund managers perhaps anywhere from .1% to .3% of the assets being managed. Those fees will not make the managers rich anytime soon. How do they respond? Welcome to the world of “principal protected notes.”
These structured notes are marketed to track an underlying index (say the S&P 500) while guaranteeing no loss of principal. Wow. Sounds like a great product. Where do I sign? Well, hold on just a second. I am not stating that structured notes do not have some degree of merit, but one needs to be very cautious in fully understanding how these notes work before purchasing. (more…)
Capitalism’s New Clothes
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 24th, 2009 8:47 PM |
In the midst of this economic turmoil, I have heard many people question whether Americans will truly change their profligate ways. Will our belt tightening occur in the proper fashion? Will we instill disciplines in the most impactful and effective areas of our lives? Or is belt tightening for others?
Peter Singer, a Thought Leader, and another of our Economic All-Stars (see left sidebar), opines on these topics in Capitalism’s New Clothes. I appreciated his piercing review of whether we will truly display the character and integrity to bring about the changes that our society so badly needs.
I hope you enjoy this piece by Singer as well as the wealth of fine writing from around the globe and collectively delivered at Project Syndicate. Hopefully these great minds help you navigate your own economic landscape!
LD
Looking Back and Looking Forward
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 24th, 2009 2:41 PM |
John Mauldin, one of our Economic All-Stars (see sidebar on left), provides personal insights and perspectives that are truly cutting edge. Additionally, John has relationships that provide real clarity.
John Mauldin recently published commentary from Paul McCulley of Pimco and former Fed chairman Paul Volker. I had the good fortune of working with Mr. McCulley in the late ’90s at Union Bank of Switzerland. He is a true gem. Mr. Volker, like him or not, is regarded as one of the world’s leading central bankers. Their comments are both comprehensive and understandable as we look to navigate the economic landscape!
Mr. McCulley looks backward and reviews the following:
— the basics of our banking system
— a review of the “unregulated” shadow banking system
— the deleveraging process
— questions on the implementation of the government backstops, including the Term Asset-Backed Lending Facility to restart the consumer lending markets, and the public-private partnership. (more…)
How Does One Lose $125 Billion?
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 24th, 2009 6:00 AM |
It’s as easy as A-I-G…
While the government has pumped billions of dollars into Freddie, Fannie, the banks, the auto companies, and on and on it goes, the largest single government intervention into a private company centers on AIG. How are our investment dollars doing? Bloomberg.com reported:
“While I anticipated AIG would come back to the government begging for additional taxpayer dollars, I am disturbed that it has happened so soon,” said U.S. Representative Elijah Cummings, the Maryland Democrat who has criticized the insurer’s retention pay program, in a statement today.
The government saved AIG from collapse to prevent losses at banks that did business with the insurer.
“Counterparties around the world continue to have significant exposure to AIG, and market conditions continue to be fragile and sensitive to the potential disorderly failure of AIG,” the Fed said in a report in November.
(more…)
