Barclays Libor Scandal: The Complicit Regulators
Posted by Larry Doyle on July 17th, 2012 12:40 PM |
Today’s Wall Street Journal lead editorial, New York Fed to Barclays: ‘Mm hmm’, concludes,
. . . if this is really the epic deceit and crime we are now reading about, then either new evidence needs to come to light, or the regulators who smiled and nodded and “Okayed” and “Mm hmmed” through the panic years are complicit with the banks now in the dock. They had ample opportunity to shut down this behavior, but nothing released by the New York Fed or the Bank of England suggests much more than a raised eyebrow at the time.
I am highly confident that there is plenty of supportive evidence of deceit and conspiratorial activity in the many thousands of e-mails and communications which officials have indicated they already hold. That said, I am also confident — and let’s not discount for even a second — that the regulators were complicit with the banks now in the dock. Why so confident? (more…)
Tags: Banking Industry Tobacco Moment, Barclays Libor Scandal, Barclays Libor Scandal Bank of England, Barclays Libor Scandal equated to Tobacco Litigation, Barclays Libor scandal failure of regulators, cut the head off, did regulators look the other way in the Libor scandal, how regulators failed to protect in Barclays Libor scandal, lack of regulatory oversight in the Libor scandal, Libor scandal, Libor scandal complicit regulators, Libor scandal what about the regulators, Manipulating Libor like lying about tobacco, New York Fed to Barclays: 'Mm hmm', rigging Libor like tobacco, Wall Street Journal editorial July 17 2012, Wall Street-Washington incest, were regulators complicit in the Libor scandal, where were regulators in the Libor scandal
Posted in General, Libor, Wall Street Journal, Wall Street Washington Incest | 14 Comments »
RSS Feed
Twitter
Facebook
Email
Home












