US Supreme Court Declines to Hear Standard Investment v FINRA
Posted by Larry Doyle on January 17th, 2012 4:54 PM |
In the fall of 2009, I was asked by some Washington based attorneys if I was aware of a case known as Standard Investment Chartered v FINRA. I informed them that I did not know the case.
These attorneys shared with me information that seemed to expose that the merger of two regulators to form Wall Street’s current SRO FINRA was predicated on a proxy statement that included misinformation. I was enormously intrigued and tracked the case closely, including paying a visit into the federal courthouse in New York to observe a hearing on this case.
The crux of the case was that executives of FINRA improperly represented information in the proxy statement used for a merger of the NASD and the regulatory arm of the NYSE. (more…)
Tags: benefits of absolute immunity, can people sue FINRA, immunity without transparency is a license to steal, lies, lying at FINRA, lying on Wall Street, Mary Schapiro, merger to form FINRA, proxy statement, Richard Greenfield, Sense on Cents, Standard Chartered v FINRA, Supreme Court declinews to hear case against FINRA, US Supreme Court declines to hear case against FINRA, we fought the good fight
Posted in FINRA, General | 6 Comments »
RSS Feed
Twitter
Facebook
Email
Home












