LD’s ‘Rules of Trading’
Posted by Larry Doyle on September 2nd, 2009 3:17 PM |
I loved my 15 years worth of trading experience on Wall Street. I thrived on the energy, competitiveness, and discipline critically important to generating long term profitability.
While many media outlets focus on the energy and competitiveness involved in trading, rest assured the real key to successful trading and investing is discipline. In my opinion, this characteristic receives far less focus and attention than it deserves.
I believe discipline is both an intrinsic and acquired trait. In fact, often the real benefits from a disciplined approach are the lessons learned from being undisciplined. Believe me, I learned many of these lessons early on and throughout my career on Wall Street. I accrued plenty of losses in the process.
How did I develop and maintain a disciplined approach during my 23 year Wall Street career? Very simply, I kept a written list of ‘trading rules’ on a piece of paper typically taped to my computer terminal.
High five to AS with whom I developed these rules back in the mid 1980s. These rules not only helped me generate profits, but more importantly kept me from making trading mistakes and thus avert losses.
Let’s review the rules that I applied to trading mortgage-backed securities in the 1980s and 1990s. In many respects, I continue to apply a semblance of these rules today.
LD’s Rules of Trading
1. Market Goes in the Direction Which Hurts the Most People
I would check the stochastics regularly to monitor when the bond market (typically the government bond market) was approaching an overbought or oversold condition. Assessing this measure is decidedly more challenging currently given the presence of Uncle Sam in the marketplace.
2. Never Short a Specified Bond
How often I would see traders short specified bonds without any appreciation for the available float. Initial short sales may appear to be profitable only to turn into nightmares when the trader had to find the bond for delivery to the buyer.
3. Never Set Up for a Trade
This rule specifically addresses a trader’s inclination to establish a trading position based upon color from a client that the client himself planned to enter into the trade. Experience taught me that often the client would find a reason not to execute the trade and now the trader was stuck with the position. (more…)
Tags: energy competitiveness and discipline for trading bonds on Wall Street, Greater Fool Theory, know your customer, learning from losses, lessons learned from losing money, market goes in direction which hurts most people, rules of trading bonds on Wall Street, setting up for a trade, shorting bonds must focus on float, staying out of meetings, successful trading on Wall Street, trading bonds on Wall Street, Wall Street trading MBS, what are stochastics, what does it take to trade on Wall Street, what does one need to succeed in Wall Street trading, what is the most important aspect of trading
Posted in General, trading | 6 Comments »
RSS Feed
Twitter
Facebook
Email
Home













Banks Are Forestalling Rather Than Foreclosing
Posted by Larry Doyle on September 3rd, 2009 12:22 PM |
What happens when a bank forecloses on a home? It has to book a loss. How are banks dealing with the rapidly increasing rates of delinquencies and subsequent foreclosures? They are forestalling the losses by allowing homeowners to remain in the home for a protracted period. Are they doing this out of generosity? Don’t be that naive. The banks are utilizing the ‘hope’ hedge. That is, they ‘hope’ the economy and housing market will rebound so the values of these homes increase and the loss is mitigated.
Over many years of trading and investing, the ‘hope’ hedge is a recipe for further losses. Why? Please refer to my Rule #1 from yesterday’s “LD’s Rules of Trading”: The Market Goes in the Direction Which Hurts the Most People.
Homes that would otherwise be in foreclosure create a massive overhang of supply in the shadow housing inventory. Do banks believe that buyers do not appreciate this? That would be even more naive. The excess supply will keep a lid on home prices and consumer wealth which directly impacts retail sales.
High five to MC for sharing a recent report from American Banker addressing this phenomena. Kate Berry writes Postponing the Day of Reckoning, which I am able to access from Bank Investment Consultant. Ms. Berry shares some very sobering insights:
These perspectives are totally consistent with those of John Lounsbury, my guest this past Sunday on NQR’s Sense on Cents with Larry Doyle. John pointedly detailed that only 10% of homes being sold currently entail ‘willing sellers.’
What are the implications for this forestalling?
>> Continued pressure on housing overall.
>> Continued pressure on bank earnings from these mortgages.
>> Continued underwhelming trends in retail sales by consumers.
>> Prospective home buyers, especially in the higher price ranges, can remain patient.
Regardless of what bank analysts or others may want to say, these forestalled homes are not going away.
LD
Tags: Amherst Securities comments on housing overhang, bank foreclosures, banks are postponing foreclosures, banks are using hope hedge, banks hope economy and housing rebounds, Deborah Voelz of National Asset Direct comments on housing supply, forestalled homes v foreclosed homes, hope is a lousy hedge, housing, housing supply impacts consumer retail sales, impact of overhang of housing supply, John Lounsbury comments on willing home sellers, Kate Berry Postponing the Day of Reckoning, market goes in direction which hurts most people, Rick Sharga comments on housing supply and foreclosure process, shadow inventory of homes, supply of homes, supply overhang of homes, what is hope hedge, why are banks postponing foreclosures
Posted in foreclosures, General, Housing Crisis | 3 Comments »