RSS Feed
Twitter
Facebook
Email
HomeLegalized Bribery
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 16th, 2009 6:57 PM |
Quality business relationships are always mutually beneficial. If they are not mutually beneficial, then they will not thrive or perhaps even last at all. A strong business relationship, like any personal relationship, needs a foundation of honesty and
integrity. As in any relationship, there will be plenty of instances in which the parties have disagreements and misunderstandings. If the relationship is strong enough, it can not only endure through these times but often grow stronger as a result of them.
The challenge in any relationship is when one party is conflicted and attempts to serve two masters. These conflicted relationships – whether personal, political, social, or business – must change in order to grow or are doomed to languish and underperform if not die completely. On Wall Street, a business that so grossly prioritizes short term profits versus long term customer relationships will not grow. Perhaps for a period of time the excess profits will be addicting and mesmerize management, but over time that model will not work. Bear Stearns is a classic example of this principle. From having worked there for 7 years in the 90s, I evidenced it firsthand. (more…)
Cheaters Never Win
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 12th, 2009 7:34 PM |
While our country has had high profile cheats such as Bernie Madoff, Barry Bonds, and the crowd from Enron amongst MANY others, we have other cheats permeating our lives every day. Tim Geithner offered that “he screwed up” on his taxes and Alex Rodriguez claimed that he was young and naive from 2001-2003 when he took steroids. In my opinion, I believe both of these individuals are representative of a society that has become far too lax in tolerating a lack of decency and integrity. This is not good business!!
In the midst of the current economic turmoil, we all want to look for individuals, groups, parties, and/or industries that are culpable and direct our indignation towards them. While we may gain some sort of short term gratification, are we changing the nature of the dialogue and in turn the course of our country? I think not.
The opportunity for the “silent majority” within the American public to voice their opinion, promote real core values of decency and accountability, and “lead” our country has never been greater. (more…)
Let’s Question the Bank CEOs
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 11th, 2009 9:27 AM |
This morning at 10am, the CEOs of the major money center banks in our country will be in Washington to face Congressional heat. Watch it LIVE on C-Span3.
These CEOs are easy targets for plenty of reasons. As a precursor to their testimony, I thought it may be helpful to view a 1-minute clip of Jamie Dimon, CEO of JP Morgan, commenting on the proposed stimulus plan, the state of the banking industry, and the concept of nationalizing the banking industry.
If I were questioning these CEOs, I would want to ask the following:
1. To all the CEOs, how do you justify paying $18+ billion in year end bonuses after having taken more than $150+ billion in government funding?
2. Why shouldn’t Citi be formally nationalized right now given the market’s belief that if positions were marked to market properly that the institution would be insolvent?
3. How do you justify the egregious process of raising rates on credit card lines for consumers who are not delinquent?
One MASSIVE Margin Call
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 10th, 2009 3:46 PM |
In light of the serious economic crisis facing our country and the world today, there is understandably heightened interest and anticipation towards both the proposed Stimulus Plan and the newly designated Financial Stability Plan. Clearly every individual in our country is impacted by this turmoil and we are hopeful that our leaders in both the private and public sectors can display the real leadership necessary to “right the ship.” Let’s provide a concise review of the newly designated Financial Stability Plan proposed today by Secretary Geithner. I’ll then move toward a further review of our economy and what it means for us going forward.
Financial Stability Plan
Secretary Geithner prefaced his remarks by highlighting that this process will “take time to resolve.” He offered that there is plenty of blame to go around to the public and private sectors, including the regulatory and rating agencies. He acknowledged that public distrust has heightened in the process. While he believes the government is being appropriately aggressive with this plan, I do not share that opinion. I commend him for emphatically stating that there will be total transparency in the process, along with strong contingencies for any entities that borrow public funds. All details will be posted on www.financialstability.gov.
While Geithner did lay out the overview of the plan, he did not extensively provide details. The market has sold off 3% in the process. I believe the market also sold off given the realization that this plan is going to take a LONG time to make a real impact. Let’s get to the meat of the plan: (more…)
An $800 Billion Mistake
Posted by Larry Doyle on February 7th, 2009 4:40 PM |
The American populace knows that the primary architects in the formulation of the Stimulus Plan working its way through Congress are Rahm Emanuel, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid. This contingent, along with President Obama, have not been bashful in stating they view the November election results as effectively a mandate to change policies emanating from Washington. Against that backdrop, the initially proposed Stimulus Plan was so loaded with pork that the Republicans and the American population at large slammed it as more a promotion of the Democratic agenda than a true stimulus plan.
I will give President Obama credit for formulating a Panel to Advise Obama on Economy. This panel will be known as the White House Economic Recovery Advisory Board. The Board will be headed by former Fed chair Paul Volcker. He will be joined by Jeff Immelt of GE, James Owens of Caterpillar, William Donaldson, former SEC chair, Roger Ferguson Jr. of TIAA-CREF, Richard Trumka of AFL-CIO, Anna Burger of SEIU, and Martin Feldstein, renowned Harvard economist. The group will be guided by Austan Goolsbee, an economic adviser to the White House.
Do you think President Obama and his economic team would listen to Mr. Feldstein or is that a “mere courtesy” having him on the board. Let’s review what Mr. Feldstein said about the Stimulus Plan just last week.
Will Be Held to Account
Posted by Larry Doyle on January 21st, 2009 8:25 AM |
All eyes were fixed on Washington on Tuesday. Prior to addressing dramatic developments in the world of finance, I would like to make a brief comment about the inauguration of Barack Obama from a historical perspective. I am proud to be an American and revel in seeing the smooth transfer of power. I think back to the stories my Dad shared with me as to how Irish politicians in Boston gained power. In the late 1800s, many job listings in Boston, and I assume other cities as well, included the letters NINA. “No Irish need apply” branded my ancestors as second class citizens. My Irish forefathers had a burning desire to move out of the ghetto. That desire was aided by the general ascent of the Irish to political power in Boston.
While I certainly do not agree with President Obama on a wide array of issues, I do hope President Obama’s ascendancy to the highest office in the land inspires current and future generations of African Americans and others who may have felt disenfranchised. For our country and all her citizens, I wish him well as he undertakes his role.
In the course of his speech this afternoon, President Obama remarked, “those of us who manage the public’s dollars will be held to account–to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day–because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.” I am going to take him up on this.
As I heard this remark, I thought of my desire to pursue further questioning of proposed SEC chair Mary Schapiro. Rest assured, we will push on for the simple reason that our democracy deserves no less. I hope everybody who reads our work will join our efforts and, as necessary, will write or forward material to your respective representatives in Washington. (more…)
When Big Ben Speaks….
Posted by Larry Doyle on January 14th, 2009 9:40 PM |
Against the backdrop of the frozen tundra, numerous members of the storied Pittsburgh Steelers franchise have reached
Chairman of Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke
legendary status. Included in this family are such greats as Jack Lambert, Mean Joe Greene, Terry Bradshaw, Rocky Bleier, Franco Harris, John Stallworth, Lynn Swann, Chuck Noll, and the longtime owner Art Rooney. For lovers of the NFL, these men are true giants. The current Steelers franchise is led by budding legend and All-Pro quarterback Ben Roethlisberger. When “Big Ben” leads, Pittsburgh follows. You can discuss this “Big Ben” tonight and every Wednesday night at 9PM on “No Topic Taboo . . . Everything Else with Jay.”
With all due respect to Mr. Roethlisberger, though, there are two other “Big Bens” that crossed paths just yesterday and hold much greater sway and impact in world affairs. I speak of Ben Bernanke and the famous London clock tower.
While the NFL is a great diversion, we ultimately return to the real world and need to deal with the realities it presents. Fed chairman, “Big Ben” Bernanke, presented chilling testimony yesterday in the shadows of the famous clock tower at the London School of Economics.
Understand that every message delivered by a Fed chairman is very carefully scripted. In years past, the Fed was much less transparent than it is today. That said, the Fed chairman speaks carefully so as not to unsettle markets but also to provide an outline as to future policy. In so doing, the general public is often hard pressed to decipher what he is saying and what it means. The general media typically does not capture the nuances and subtleties offered by the Fed. To that end, our work here at No Quarter looks to fill that void.
Got Insurance? 529 Plans? Financial Aid? Read On . . .
Posted by Larry Doyle on January 13th, 2009 5:10 PM |
At the request of numerous readers, I am offering a transcript review of my interview this past Sunday evening with insurance and financial planning expert, Sean D’Arcy. Additionally, if you’d like to listen to this interview in its entirety, just click on the Play button below for the audio recording. Once the playback has started, you can fast forward or rewind to any portion of the show by clicking at any point along the play bar. Archived programs are also available as a podcast from iTunes.
As a disclaimer, the opinions offered are Sean’s alone. The transcription is mine. I have no vested financial interest in Sean’s business or any of the views or companies mentioned. The purpose of providing this recap is strictly as a public service. To the extent that you find this material beneficial, my mission is accomplished. If you find this material helpful, please forward it along. If we grow our audience in the process that would be great!
Sean is a self-employed independent insurance and financial planning executive. He is a graduate of Columbia ’81.
LD: Sean, can you address how the insurance industry is regulated?
SD: The insurance industry is regulated by 50 separate state insurance offices. Each of those offices is responsible for the oversight of insurance business done within their state. Some states are very disciplined in this process, for example New York has very strong oversight. Other states are clearly lacking in the professional expertise to properly oversee insurance business within their state. Each state insurance commissioner is appointed by the respective governors. Each state insurance office is funded by a tax on the premiums written in that state. For example, New York imposes a 4% tax on each policy written in the state. An emergency fund is also put in place to address potential funding problems with individual companies.
Market Musings on a Monday
Posted by Larry Doyle on January 12th, 2009 10:05 PM |
With so many cross-currents in our economy and markets, it is little wonder that people feel overwhelmed and disoriented. The powers-that-be in Washington are in a period of transition with plenty of backroom dealing going on from both a political and economic standpoint. The financial markets remain challenged from a liquidity and valuation standpoint. Against these backdrops, I hope readers are becoming more comfortable with my analysis of the economy, the markets, and the world of finance at large. Let’s dive into the issues and topics I find most compelling.
Earnings and Outlooks
On the equity front, the bottom line — that being earnings — is ultimately what drives prices. Time and time again we will hear analysts and money managers “talk their positions.” These individuals are either blinded by the big picture or talking the party line. In our piece on January 8th, “Time, Why You Punish Me?” I stated that “earnings expectations truly concern me.”
Fast forward to today and we see that Citigroup is leaking information into the market that their Q4 2008 earnings will be significantly worse than expected. Initially, Citi’s Q4 2008 earnings (why do we still use that term? They have not made money in so long. Wouldn’t it be better to merely call them losses and save ourselves the headache?) were expected to be -$4 billion. Citi is now leaking to the market that earnings will more likely be -$6 billion and that is only because they are recognizing a gain of $4 billion on the sale of a German retail banking business. Thus, ex that sale, Citi had a $10 billion operating loss for the Q4 2008.
IT’S EASY TO FIND FAULT…especially if you’re clueless!!
Posted by Larry Doyle on December 11th, 2008 10:10 AM |
Given the pressure applied by the general public on elected officials who passed the $700bln dollar TARP (Treasury Asset Repurchase Program) it is not surprising that those very elected officials are now openly critical of Treasury. Nothing like casting a few aspersions to keep the crowd back home somewhat at bay. This statement is not to say that Treasury has not fumbled in certain aspects of this program. That said, as I have tried to highlight, there are so many holes to fill that one single, albeit massive, “tourniquet” is not going to cover an entire body riddled with life threatening wounds.
Read how “Watchdogs Chide Treasury on Bailout“…
For Congress to think that the economy would see near “immediate” positive reaction to the injection of capital into the system is both naive and ignorant. I am going to guess that most Congressmen failed Economics 101.
IMO Treasury should not have played “whack a mole” but should have proactively highlighted the areas of need throughout the system. In properly managing expectations it is always better to be as comprehensive as possible and simultaneously “under-promise and over-deliver”. Paulson and Bernanke along with Paulson’s boy wonder, Neel Kashkari, have played way too much defense and not enough offense. The risk they ran in this regard, though, is that they may have “spooked” the markets and “scared” the public. (more…)
