Subscribe: RSS Feed | Twitter | Facebook | Email
Home | Contact Us

Posts Tagged ‘Goldman business model’

Goldman Sachs and Uncle Sam’s “Games People Play”

Posted by Larry Doyle on August 17th, 2010 7:42 AM |

Why does it seem that whenever something really dicey happens on Wall Street, the crowd at Goldman Sachs is typically in the middle of it? How so? Let’s enter the world of new issue equity underwriting.

There is very little that is truly sacred on Wall Street. That said, one of the traditional “sacred untouchables” on the street of dreams has been the new issue equity underwriting spread. Maintaining this spread between a cushy 2% to 3% level is typically sacrosanct and actually more easily maintained now given the oligopoly that currently defines Wall Street. I have written extensively on how this game of oligopoly has been played on Wall Street circa 2010. (more…)

Getting Goldman’s Call

Posted by Larry Doyle on August 24th, 2009 7:57 AM |

Goldman Sachs remains the focus of media attention. How do these wizards of Wall Street make so much money? What goes on inside 85 Broad Street? Is everything on the up and up? Are they smarter than everybody else on Wall Street? Does Goldman have better systems?

I addressed the Goldman business model on July 6th when I wrote, “How Does Goldman Sachs Operate?” I specifically highlighted:

Goldman decided to utilize its capital and balance sheet less so for origination capabilities and much more for principal trading (that is, making bets and taking positions with its own capital). Effectively, Goldman decided to operate much more like a large multi-strategy hedge fund. Goldman took enormous risks both in their proprietary books but also in their trading activity with customers. Goldman made a concerted decision to dominate the markets in which they chose to play.

If a firm is going to take large principal risk positions both within proprietary books and customer books (trading accounts used to trade with clients), two factors are of overwelming importance: information and relationships.

Goldman worked both of these angles very, very hard. Goldman developed extremely close relationships with the largest customers in the market and the largest power brokers in Washington and around the globe.

Many of Goldman’s relationships are with very active trading hedge funds. These funds know one goal–making money. Are rules violated? I’m sure they have been.

This morning, The Wall Street Journal reports Goldman’s Trading Tips Rewards Its Biggest Clients:

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. research analyst Marc Irizarry’s published rating on mutual-fund manager Janus Capital Group Inc. was a lackluster “neutral” in early April 2008. But at an internal meeting that month, the analyst told dozens of Goldman’s traders the stock was likely to head higher, company documents show.

The next day, research-department employees at Goldman called about 50 favored clients of the big securities firm with the same tip, including hedge-fund companies Citadel Investment Group and SAC Capital Advisors, the documents indicate. Readers of Mr. Irizarry’s research didn’t find out he was bullish until his written report was issued six days later, after Janus shares had jumped 5.8%.

[Goldman's Trading Tips Reward Its Biggest Clients]

Every week, Goldman analysts offer stock tips at a gathering the firm calls a “trading huddle.” But few of the thousands of clients who receive Goldman’s written research reports ever hear about the recommendations.

At the meetings, Goldman analysts identify stocks they think are likely to rise or fall due to earnings announcements, the direction of the overall market or other short-term developments. Some of their recommendations differ from ratings printed in Goldman’s widely circulated research reports. Some Goldman traders who make bets with the firm’s own money attend the meetings.

Critics complain that Goldman’s distribution of the trading ideas only to its own traders and key clients hurts other customers who aren’t given the opportunity to trade on the information.

Securities laws require firms like Goldman to engage in “fair dealing with customers,” and prohibit analysts from issuing opinions that are at odds with their true beliefs about a stock. Steven Strongin, Goldman’s stock research chief, says no one gains an unfair advantage from its trading huddles, and that the short-term-trading ideas are not contrary to the longer-term stock forecasts in its written research.

Former Goldman client George Klopfer of Park City, Utah, who was unaware of the trading tips until recently, says the practice is unfair. “When I joined Goldman as a client, I got all these fancy brochures saying they put the client first,” he says. “I just don’t want to have to worry about them or big clients trading on stuff like this. I was at the end of the food chain.” He says he pulled out most of the $20 million in his account earlier this year after losing money on several Goldman funds. Goldman says individual clients like Mr. Klopfer typically have a long-term investing approach and are not focused on individual stocks.

I take the following away from this WSJ commentary: (more…)






Recent Posts


ECONOMIC ALL-STARS


Archives