How Will Banks ‘Manage’ Earnings?
Posted by Larry Doyle on July 14th, 2009 8:09 AM |
A number of major financial institutions are reporting 2nd quarter earnings this week. Actually, to say these institutions are truly reporting earnings would be a misnomer. To a large extent, these institutions are releasing managed earnings reports. What does that mean? Let’s navigate this ever important sector of our economic landscape.
In simplistic fashion, earnings are revenues less expenses. While financial analysts may want us to take reported earnings on face value, there is a lot more to it than that. What are the quality of the earnings? Are revenues increasing or decreasing? Are expenses increasing or decreasing? Are net margins of profitability increasing or decreasing? Are earnings a function of a growth in revenues or more a reduction in expenses?
In regard to a financial institution’s earnings, the greatest expense is typically compensation and benefits. On Wall Street, the expense associated with personnel usually runs between 50-55% of overall expenses.
On the revenue side of the ledger, earnings are broken down by division. How much revenue is produced from fee-generating business units and is repeatable versus how much is generated from volatile trading businesses and is thus more risky. Fee generating revenue is considered to be of higher quality. As such, the market attaches a higher multiple to the earnings from those business units.
In my opinion, the most opaque component of earnings and income statements revolves around valuations of assets held on the financial institution’s books. This component of an earnings statement is truly where the financial wizards on Wall Street get most creative. The assets to which I refer are:
1. Securities positions, that is, the variety of different bonds, stocks, and derivatives held by the institutions. While plenty of these assets are very liquid, easily evaluated, and thus easily marked, others are much less so. For a wealth of toxic assets (different types of mortgage assets, CDOs, and the like), these institutions were blessed by the FASB (Federal Accounting Standards Board) to mark them at levels which they deem appropriate versus where the assets may actually be trading in the marketplace. In the process, these institutions are sitting on hundreds of billions of embedded, yet unrealized, losses. How and when may those losses be recognized? When the underlying loans backing these securities default. Let’s move to that aspect of ‘managed earnings.’ (more…)
Tags: 2nd quarter bank earnings, are banks assets marked appropriately, are banks reserving enough against bad loans, bank earnings are managed, bank reserves against bad loans, banks are front end loading earnings, banks have underreserved, can earnings reports be trusted, components of earnings reports for banks, earnings quality for banks, embedded losses on banks books, fee generating businesses for banks, financial charade by banks, financial earnings reports more managed than real, how are earnings reports generated, how are reserves set aside by banks, how are securities marked on a banks books, how do banks make money, how do banks value assets on books, levels of defaults on bank loans, levels of delinquencies on bank loans, levels of foreclosures on bank loans, managed earnings versus real earnings, multiples attached to business units of banks, quality of bank earnings, relaxation of mark to market, should we take bank earnings on face value, trading revenue businesses for banks, what do bank earnings cover, what is a multiple for earnings, what is behind bank earnings, what level of reserves do banks set aside, when are embedded losses recognized by banks, where do banks make money
Posted in Banking Institutions, General, bank earnings | No Comments »
RSS Feed
Twitter
Facebook
Email
Home








