Subscribe: RSS Feed | Twitter | Facebook | Email
Home | Contact Us

Trading Volumes Plummet, “Choose Not To Play”

Posted by Larry Doyle on March 9, 2012 8:58 AM |

“The problem here is, when the public becomes aware of the nature of the game, they may choose not to play. This is the problem not only for Goldman but for Wall Street as a whole if people choose not to play.”  

I made that statement in the midst of an interview two years ago with CNBC’s Mark Haines (may he rest in eternal peace) about Goldman Sachs. (For those interested you can access that interview here. My comments about Goldman specifically and this topic begin around the 3 minute mark.)

What have trading volumes done on the NYSE over the last two years? 

They are down close to 30%.

How about over the last three years? Down over 50%. What is going on here?

Let’s take a deep dive and review this situation with the help of the Securities Technology Monitor which writes, NYSE Volumes Cut in Half, in Three Years:

NYSE Euronext said its dive in trading volume has deepened, in both stocks and derivatives.

Globally, its average daily volume in derivatives contracts was 7.0 million in February, down 21.4 percent from a year ago. Europe was down 35.7 percent and U.S. equity options down 9.2 percent.

The operator of the New York Stock Exchange, NYSE Arca and NYSE Amex said its trading in stocks in the United States was down 21.0 percent from a year ago.

Most notably, the number of shares that it traded in the month of February in NYSE-listed stocks fell below the level of activity of 2004 – and is half what it was three years ago, when the credit crisis roiled financial markets.

Activity in NYSE’s “group share” of NYSE-listed stocks was 23.7 billion shares in February 2012.

That compares to 29.3 billion a year ago, 32.7 billion two years ago and … 50.3 billion in February 2009.

The 23.7 billion shares in February 2012 compares to 28.2 billion in February 2004, according to statistics kept by NYSE Euronext on nyxdata.com.

In a given day, NYSE Euronext handled 1.8 billion shares of all listed stocks in the United States in February. That was down 21 percent from a year ago and 2.2 percent from January.

The exchange operator and technology supplier also said its European stock trading showed a decrease of 8.7 percent from a year ago, to 1.6 million transactions a day in February. But that was up 7.1 percent from January.

Its European derivatives products daily volume of 2.8 million contracts was down 35.7 percent from last year and 11.9 percent from last month.

I do know that volumes at other exchanges such as BATS have increased as a percentage of total volume over the last few years.  We should also be mindful that, by all projections, approximately 70-75% of overall volumes on the equity exchanges are driven by high frequency traders. Yes, that form of trading which presents itself as adding liquidity, but Sense on Cents believes is more glorified front running than anything else.

Where was that liquidity on May 6, 2010, the day of the infamous Flash Crash on Wall Street when the market nose-dived approximately 1000 points in a matter of minutes?

So what is behind the enormous drop in volumes on the NYSE and other exchanges? We could banter about increased regulations on the industry and overarching government intervention in our markets and economy. There is clearly some validity to these points. I believe they pale in comparison to what I believe is the greater reason though. What is that?

A lack of trust.

Do you believe your principal is protected when you witness situations such as MF Global? Are you in a hurry to venture into the water when you see a Flash Crash with little real response from the regulators to mediate effectively?

The volume numbers do not lie.

When capital is not protected, those in charge of managing that capital will choose not to play.

As hard as the crowd on Wall Street and in Washington may care to spin the numbers, the numbers on the floor of the Euronext NYSE speak VOLUMES — even when those volumes are plummeting.

What do you think? Are you trading or not trading? Can you tell us why your trading is increasing or decreasing?  Comments encouraged and appreciated.

Isn’t it time to  subscribe to all my work via e-mailRSS feed, on Twitter or Facebook?

Do your friends, family, and colleagues a favor and get them to do the same. Thanks!!

I have no affiliation or business interest with any entity referenced in this commentary. The opinions expressed are my own. I am a proponent of real transparency within our markets, our economy, and our political realm so that meaningful investor confidence and investor protection can be achieved.

Larry Doyle

 

 

  • bob leinbach

    Good seeing you today. Funny your topic should be exactly what’s running me around. What is Joe Blow to make of the markets after it has become a casino for day traders? I think they should rename them insecurities, eh? thanks, Bob

  • Frank

    The risk reward ratio is not favorable for the individual investor, and it doesn’t appear that anyone is trustworthy.

  • Brian

    I have not made a trade since 2008. Why? Moral disgust.

    I am withdrawing all money from my retirement accounts and investing it into productive local assets which can benefit my local economy.

    • Mark

      Good for you, hope you’re in my community, I’m staring into the abyss right now, homeless or worse is in my near future

  • Peter S.

    Remember, if you don’t play nice – no one will want to play with you.






Recent Posts


ECONOMIC ALL-STARS


Archives