<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;There&#8217;s Something About Mary&#8217; as Madoff Calls Schapiro &#8220;a Dear Friend&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/10/theres-something-about-mary-as-madoff-calls-schapiro-a-dear-friend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/10/theres-something-about-mary-as-madoff-calls-schapiro-a-dear-friend/</link>
	<description>Navigating the Economic Landscape</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:06:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheehy</title>
		<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/10/theres-something-about-mary-as-madoff-calls-schapiro-a-dear-friend/comment-page-1/#comment-7391</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sheehy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.senseoncents.com/?p=12354#comment-7391</guid>
		<description>One can now reasonably fear that the lack of action by the SEC in reference to Bernard Madoff is less a case of negligence rooted in lack of focus and vigilance, but rather an intentional ignorance of a clear pattern of illicit activity by a well-connected individual who was once praised in the investment and charitable worlds. Whether officials opted to don blinders in a state of denial, or more culpably, believed that the benefits of allowing Madoff to operate outweighed the attendant risks and costs, has yet to be seen.  In either case, the SEC and related agencies have some serious soul-searching to undertake.

Even a casual perusal of the 25-page executive summary of the September SEC report on the investigation is akin to watching an impending train wreck. In particular, the SEC inaction despite numerous, specific complaints about two major red flags was very telling. First, Madoff&#039;s returns had little correlation to comparable securities indexes, and were supposedly generated through the use of complex, secretive, nearly impossible methods. An unnamed hedge fund manager was concerned about Madoff’s investments, and told the SEC in 2003 that &quot;Madoff&#039;s strategy had no correlation to the overall equity market in over 10 years&quot;. Second, his employment of a solo, partial auditor, David G. Friehling, flagrantly violated FASB SFAC 2 in regard to GAAP standards of neutrality, and associated verifiability and representative faithfulness. Reporting that would customarily be transparent and straightforward was instead opaque, scant, and in many cases inaccessible at Madoff’s funds. Prominent Madoff critic Harry Markopoulos noted in a letter to the SEC in 2000 that Madoff did not permit outside audits. Arguably, Friehling’s activities also violated the intent of the &quot;internal control over financial reporting&quot; provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley 404. Additionally, the report details numerous complaints from individuals concerned that Madoff was conducting his fund as a Ponzi scheme.    

Madoff was very generous in the past with his charitable giving- and also purported management of money for non-profits, especially those with Jewish affiliations. He abused that trust to feed his false funds, and caused considerable damage to non-profit assets, along with individual investors within that community. Additionally, as other articles on this site allude to, there is considerable evidence that government officials and their associated agencies had financial interests in Madoff’s funds.

Even Bernard Madoff believes in that which he failed to do, as he stated in a recent jailhouse interview as detailed in the Wall Street Journal on October 31st.  &quot;It&#039;s very easy if you want.” said Madoff to SEC Inspector General H. David Kotz. “You must do a third-party check. It&#039;s an absolute must. It&#039;s accounting 101.&quot;

But even if the SEC did check- why did they not act?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can now reasonably fear that the lack of action by the SEC in reference to Bernard Madoff is less a case of negligence rooted in lack of focus and vigilance, but rather an intentional ignorance of a clear pattern of illicit activity by a well-connected individual who was once praised in the investment and charitable worlds. Whether officials opted to don blinders in a state of denial, or more culpably, believed that the benefits of allowing Madoff to operate outweighed the attendant risks and costs, has yet to be seen.  In either case, the SEC and related agencies have some serious soul-searching to undertake.</p>
<p>Even a casual perusal of the 25-page executive summary of the September SEC report on the investigation is akin to watching an impending train wreck. In particular, the SEC inaction despite numerous, specific complaints about two major red flags was very telling. First, Madoff&#8217;s returns had little correlation to comparable securities indexes, and were supposedly generated through the use of complex, secretive, nearly impossible methods. An unnamed hedge fund manager was concerned about Madoff’s investments, and told the SEC in 2003 that &#8220;Madoff&#8217;s strategy had no correlation to the overall equity market in over 10 years&#8221;. Second, his employment of a solo, partial auditor, David G. Friehling, flagrantly violated FASB SFAC 2 in regard to GAAP standards of neutrality, and associated verifiability and representative faithfulness. Reporting that would customarily be transparent and straightforward was instead opaque, scant, and in many cases inaccessible at Madoff’s funds. Prominent Madoff critic Harry Markopoulos noted in a letter to the SEC in 2000 that Madoff did not permit outside audits. Arguably, Friehling’s activities also violated the intent of the &#8220;internal control over financial reporting&#8221; provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley 404. Additionally, the report details numerous complaints from individuals concerned that Madoff was conducting his fund as a Ponzi scheme.    </p>
<p>Madoff was very generous in the past with his charitable giving- and also purported management of money for non-profits, especially those with Jewish affiliations. He abused that trust to feed his false funds, and caused considerable damage to non-profit assets, along with individual investors within that community. Additionally, as other articles on this site allude to, there is considerable evidence that government officials and their associated agencies had financial interests in Madoff’s funds.</p>
<p>Even Bernard Madoff believes in that which he failed to do, as he stated in a recent jailhouse interview as detailed in the Wall Street Journal on October 31st.  &#8220;It&#8217;s very easy if you want.” said Madoff to SEC Inspector General H. David Kotz. “You must do a third-party check. It&#8217;s an absolute must. It&#8217;s accounting 101.&#8221;</p>
<p>But even if the SEC did check- why did they not act?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/10/theres-something-about-mary-as-madoff-calls-schapiro-a-dear-friend/comment-page-1/#comment-7207</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.senseoncents.com/?p=12354#comment-7207</guid>
		<description>Bill, 

No new info other than the fact that a pending lawsuit brought by Amerivet Securities of Moreno Valley CA requests that FINRA open its books. 

This case will take time to be adjudicated, but hopefully it does bring real transparency to the Wall Street SRO, FINRA.

Rest assured, I will be monitoring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, </p>
<p>No new info other than the fact that a pending lawsuit brought by Amerivet Securities of Moreno Valley CA requests that FINRA open its books. </p>
<p>This case will take time to be adjudicated, but hopefully it does bring real transparency to the Wall Street SRO, FINRA.</p>
<p>Rest assured, I will be monitoring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/10/theres-something-about-mary-as-madoff-calls-schapiro-a-dear-friend/comment-page-1/#comment-7205</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.senseoncents.com/?p=12354#comment-7205</guid>
		<description>Larry, any further info on FINRA&#039;s disposal of the $647 mil of auction rates in 2007?   Perhaps this was simply the most amazing case of market timing in financial history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, any further info on FINRA&#8217;s disposal of the $647 mil of auction rates in 2007?   Perhaps this was simply the most amazing case of market timing in financial history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/10/theres-something-about-mary-as-madoff-calls-schapiro-a-dear-friend/comment-page-1/#comment-7052</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.senseoncents.com/?p=12354#comment-7052</guid>
		<description>EXACTLY Larry -  what is the full extent of the relationship between Mary Schapiro and Bernard Madoff?  That question absolutely must be answered as soon as possible, and it is one of the most critical (if not the most critical) questions of our time.  Furthermore, the SEC Inspector General (David Kotz) is NOT in a position to objectively investigate the SEC Chairman.  Only a truly third-party, outside entity is able to objectively investigate the Chairman of the SEC.  So, just because Kotz says that his probe didn&#039;t find any evidence to support Madoff&#039;s claim, doesn&#039;t mean Kotz did a thorough and objective probe of Mary Schapiro.  Isn&#039;t Mary Schapiro Kotz&#039; boss?  An independent and outside third party must investigate this question and get to the truth as soon as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXACTLY Larry &#8211;  what is the full extent of the relationship between Mary Schapiro and Bernard Madoff?  That question absolutely must be answered as soon as possible, and it is one of the most critical (if not the most critical) questions of our time.  Furthermore, the SEC Inspector General (David Kotz) is NOT in a position to objectively investigate the SEC Chairman.  Only a truly third-party, outside entity is able to objectively investigate the Chairman of the SEC.  So, just because Kotz says that his probe didn&#8217;t find any evidence to support Madoff&#8217;s claim, doesn&#8217;t mean Kotz did a thorough and objective probe of Mary Schapiro.  Isn&#8217;t Mary Schapiro Kotz&#8217; boss?  An independent and outside third party must investigate this question and get to the truth as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth s</title>
		<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/10/theres-something-about-mary-as-madoff-calls-schapiro-a-dear-friend/comment-page-1/#comment-7043</link>
		<dc:creator>beth s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.senseoncents.com/?p=12354#comment-7043</guid>
		<description>I agree... stay on this one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230; stay on this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/10/theres-something-about-mary-as-madoff-calls-schapiro-a-dear-friend/comment-page-1/#comment-7012</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.senseoncents.com/?p=12354#comment-7012</guid>
		<description>Stay on this, Larry! Even if Madoff weren&#039;t the criminal he is, this exposes the unequal treatment handed out by our regulators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stay on this, Larry! Even if Madoff weren&#8217;t the criminal he is, this exposes the unequal treatment handed out by our regulators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
