Comments on: When Is a $3.4 Trillion Loss Supposed To Be Good News?

By: Larry Doyle

Larry Doyle — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:07:27 +0000

Elaine, I recalled answering a few prior questions but missed that last one. I just replied to you at NQ and will leave my response here, as well. Regarding your question about the FDIC, I wrote about this topic in January. Please take a look at my piece from 1/04/09, Wall Street's Next Big Trade

By: Larry Doyle

Larry Doyle — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:48:37 +0000

Elaine,

I believe I responded to your questions. There are times when my responses get caught in the spam filter.

I will return to NQ, read your question and respond here.

By: elaine

elaine — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:23:48 +0000

Larry, I left you some messages on your Sept 26th post at NQ

By: TeakWoodKite

TeakWoodKite — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:40:52 +0000

Number 4, is a omen.

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:16:45 +0000

Makes me think of that scene in the first “Naked Gun” movie where Frank Drebin is yelling to everyone “Nothing to see here” and everything is blowing up behind him.

By: Aaron Kramer

Aaron Kramer — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:16:50 +0000

It is good news when the accounting rules allow you to ignore it. Nothing to see hear just keep moving along.