Subscribe: RSS Feed | Twitter | Facebook | Email
Home | Contact Us

“Say on Pay” or “Talk is Cheap”

Posted by Larry Doyle on June 11, 2009 8:04 AM |

There is little doubt that misaligned compensation practices played a very large role in the financial fiasco we have experienced. While the Obama administration is working on a proposal known as “say on pay” legislation crafted through the SEC, a Bloomberg report highlights that it may be more appropriate to define the legislation as “talk is cheap.” Why? Let’s review, Obama Pay Plan Lacks ‘Meat on the Bones’ To Trim CEO Paychecks

The plan announced yesterday by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner would require companies to give shareholders a non- binding vote on pay, without setting limits. Directors who determine the pay and consultants that advise companies would have to be more independent from management, Geithner said.

The administration proposal is aimed at reducing incentives that lead executives to take excessive risks and quell a political uproar over bonuses paid managers at companies including American International Group Inc. that received U.S. aid. Geithner blamed pay standards tied to short-term profits for contributing to the worst financial crisis since the 1930s.

“We’re not telling clients to be prepared for less pay,” said David Schmidt, a senior consultant for New York-based compensation firm James F. Reda & Associates. Forms of payment may be adjusted as firms give executives additional cash and put some part of their bonuses in escrow for three to five years, making pay dependent on long-term performance, he said.

I have always maintained that well enforced market based principles are the best means for executive compensation to be controlled. The fact that this legislation provides shareholders a voice is a step in the right direction but it falls woefully short. Why? A non-binding vote that is not allowed to set limits is the ultimate definition of “talk is cheap.”

Swing and a miss!! 

  • Mountainaires

    Just as the “stress” tests were a cheap trick, so it goes…they look like they’re clueless, grasping at straws, and determined to use every cheap political trick in the political play book instead of actually doing something worthwhile.

    Here’s a good article on Shelia Bair v. Timothy Geithner:

    Sheila Bair is On Your Side

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/11/sheila_bair_is_on_your_side__96925.html

    • beach

      The relationship between Robert Rubin, Citigroup and Geithner is outrageous!

      LD what are your feelings on Sheila Bair? Are you a fan? Can she be effective given all she is up against?

      Keep up your good work!

    • Mountainaires,

      I commend Bair for not playing the standard political games that regularly play out in Washington.

      We need more people like her involved in the process.

      Thanks for sharing.

  • silver

    LD, what do you mean by “well enforced market based principles” to control executive compensation?

    Great column!

    • Silver,

      I should have been more explicit. In my opinion, every public company should be compelled to provide not only the levels of compensation for all top and mid-level execs but also the methodology for compensation.

      Accounting firms that provide reviews of financials should also review compensation figures and procedures.

      Company executives should share with shareholders a thorough and detailed review of comp.

      Shareholder votes should be binding.

      Ultimately if shareholders are not satisfied they can and should SELL their stock. Management will then find out that they need to be accountable.






Recent Posts


ECONOMIC ALL-STARS


Archives