<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: April 2009 Market Review: Brave New World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/05/april-2009-market-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/05/april-2009-market-review/</link>
	<description>Navigating the Economic Landscape</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:08:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TeakWoodKite</title>
		<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/05/april-2009-market-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>TeakWoodKite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 21:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.senseoncents.com/?p=4028#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>Economic bypass surgery is required. Who will invest in a company when the government is saying the secured investment is not valid and if you don&#039;t like it , the truck will be empty by the time it leaves JFK?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economic bypass surgery is required. Who will invest in a company when the government is saying the secured investment is not valid and if you don&#8217;t like it , the truck will be empty by the time it leaves JFK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/05/april-2009-market-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1603</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 11:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.senseoncents.com/?p=4028#comment-1603</guid>
		<description>TWK....all great comments across the different posts. Always appreciated. 

No doubt the dynamics at work domestically will have to manifest themselves globally as well. 

China will clearly be impacted by our decline in consumer spending but the Chinese are operating from a much stronger initial position given their government surplus.
Against that backdrop, their economy has benefitted much more rapidly from economic stimulus packages that have been implemented. 

In terms of other &quot;forms of banking&quot;, private capital will ultimately find a means to get through clogged arteries. However, from a global standpoint the ultimate answer is TIME. New economic growth will slowly absorb the current losses in the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TWK&#8230;.all great comments across the different posts. Always appreciated. </p>
<p>No doubt the dynamics at work domestically will have to manifest themselves globally as well. </p>
<p>China will clearly be impacted by our decline in consumer spending but the Chinese are operating from a much stronger initial position given their government surplus.<br />
Against that backdrop, their economy has benefitted much more rapidly from economic stimulus packages that have been implemented. </p>
<p>In terms of other &#8220;forms of banking&#8221;, private capital will ultimately find a means to get through clogged arteries. However, from a global standpoint the ultimate answer is TIME. New economic growth will slowly absorb the current losses in the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeakWoodKite</title>
		<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/05/april-2009-market-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1598</link>
		<dc:creator>TeakWoodKite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 04:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.senseoncents.com/?p=4028#comment-1598</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;There is a very distinct shift in economic power towards China and with it a shift in political power, as well. I believe it is a question of when - not if - in terms of a major European country defaulting on its debt and requiring a rescue from the EU and/or  IMF&lt;/em&gt;

LD, Was not the IMF itself 4 billion in the hole?

Your analyisis extend to the global banking system I would venture that the points you make on the national level will manifest in &quot;new models&quot; in the global economy.

In terms of China, does not the decline in consumer consumption effect China as well? China&#039;s exports are likley to be fickle and their currency manipulation will continue. As an a side, I am wondering,
in the evolution of world banking structure will other forms of banking gain an increase in funding levels in an effort to &quot;get around&quot; some of the current economic blood clots?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>There is a very distinct shift in economic power towards China and with it a shift in political power, as well. I believe it is a question of when &#8211; not if &#8211; in terms of a major European country defaulting on its debt and requiring a rescue from the EU and/or  IMF</em></p>
<p>LD, Was not the IMF itself 4 billion in the hole?</p>
<p>Your analyisis extend to the global banking system I would venture that the points you make on the national level will manifest in &#8220;new models&#8221; in the global economy.</p>
<p>In terms of China, does not the decline in consumer consumption effect China as well? China&#8217;s exports are likley to be fickle and their currency manipulation will continue. As an a side, I am wondering,<br />
in the evolution of world banking structure will other forms of banking gain an increase in funding levels in an effort to &#8220;get around&#8221; some of the current economic blood clots?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/05/april-2009-market-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.senseoncents.com/?p=4028#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>Larry - 

The piece of this that I agree with you the most on is that analysts and economists continue to forecast future economic activity (and stock market direction) based on past models.  We are currently sailing through uncharted waters in many different ways.  The Federal Reserve&#039;s actions over the last 18 months are a great example of that.  That doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that this is a worse situation than we have faced before, it just means that it is a different situtaion than we have faced before, and that no one really knows where we are headed.  As you said, we are moving to a whole new and fundamentally different economic system and economic model.  In my opinion, any forecast, for either the economy or the stock market, that is based on past historical models is not a credible forecast.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry &#8211; </p>
<p>The piece of this that I agree with you the most on is that analysts and economists continue to forecast future economic activity (and stock market direction) based on past models.  We are currently sailing through uncharted waters in many different ways.  The Federal Reserve&#8217;s actions over the last 18 months are a great example of that.  That doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that this is a worse situation than we have faced before, it just means that it is a different situtaion than we have faced before, and that no one really knows where we are headed.  As you said, we are moving to a whole new and fundamentally different economic system and economic model.  In my opinion, any forecast, for either the economy or the stock market, that is based on past historical models is not a credible forecast.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Statement From Non-Tarp Lenders To Chrysler : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.senseoncents.com/2009/05/april-2009-market-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1585</link>
		<dc:creator>Statement From Non-Tarp Lenders To Chrysler : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.senseoncents.com/?p=4028#comment-1585</guid>
		<description>[...] my April 2009 Market Review, I commented on how Uncle Sam is not a good business partner. Business Wire issued the following [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my April 2009 Market Review, I commented on how Uncle Sam is not a good business partner. Business Wire issued the following [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
